151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28543951)
1. Determination of genetic relatedness from low-coverage human genome sequences using pedigree simulations.
Martin MD; Jay F; Castellano S; Slatkin M
Mol Ecol; 2017 Aug; 26(16):4145-4157. PubMed ID: 28543951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Allele frequency-free inference of close familial relationships from genotypes or low-depth sequencing data.
Waples RK; Albrechtsen A; Moltke I
Mol Ecol; 2019 Jan; 28(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 30462358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Joint Estimation of Relatedness Coefficients and Allele Frequencies from Ancient Samples.
Theunert C; Racimo F; Slatkin M
Genetics; 2017 Jun; 206(2):1025-1035. PubMed ID: 28396504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Moment estimators of relatedness from low-depth whole-genome sequencing data.
Herzig AF; Ciullo M; ; Leutenegger AL; Perdry H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):254. PubMed ID: 35751014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pedigree reconstruction and distant pairwise relatedness estimation from genome sequence data: A demonstration in a population of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).
Petty LE; Phillippi-Falkenstein K; Kubisch HM; Raveendran M; Harris RA; Vallender EJ; Huff CD; Bohm RP; Rogers J; Below JE
Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 May; 21(4):1333-1346. PubMed ID: 33386679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Well Do Molecular and Pedigree Relatedness Correspond, in Populations with Diverse Mating Systems, and Various Types and Quantities of Molecular and Demographic Data?
Kopps AM; Kang J; Sherwin WB; Palsbøll PJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jun; 5(9):1815-26. PubMed ID: 26134496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Practical considerations regarding the use of genotype and pedigree data to model relatedness in the context of genome-wide association studies.
Cheng R; Parker CC; Abney M; Palmer AA
G3 (Bethesda); 2013 Oct; 3(10):1861-7. PubMed ID: 23979941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
Wang J
Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inferring biological kinship in ancient datasets: comparing the response of ancient DNA-specific software packages to low coverage data.
Marsh WA; Brace S; Barnes I
BMC Genomics; 2023 Mar; 24(1):111. PubMed ID: 36918761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. correctKin: an optimized method to infer relatedness up to the 4th degree from low-coverage ancient human genomes.
Nyerki E; Kalmár T; Schütz O; Lima RM; Neparáczki E; Török T; Maróti Z
Genome Biol; 2023 Feb; 24(1):38. PubMed ID: 36855115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying Cryptic Relationships.
Sun L; Dimitromanolakis A; Chen WM
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():45-60. PubMed ID: 28980241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. swinger: a user-friendly computer program to establish captive breeding groups that minimize relatedness without pedigree information.
Sandoval-Castillo J; Attard CR; Marri S; Brauer CJ; Möller LM; Beheregaray LB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 27754599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inferring Heterozygosity from Ancient and Low Coverage Genomes.
Kousathanas A; Leuenberger C; Link V; Sell C; Burger J; Wegmann D
Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):317-332. PubMed ID: 27821432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two molecular measures of relatedness based on haplotype sharing.
Edwards D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():383. PubMed ID: 26558877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A family-based probabilistic method for capturing de novo mutations from high-throughput short-read sequencing data.
Cartwright RA; Hussin J; Keebler JE; Stone EA; Awadalla P
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 22499693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. TKGWV2: an ancient DNA relatedness pipeline for ultra-low coverage whole genome shotgun data.
Fernandes DM; Cheronet O; Gelabert P; Pinhasi R
Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):21262. PubMed ID: 34711884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genotyping-by-sequencing for estimating relatedness in nonmodel organisms: Avoiding the trap of precise bias.
Attard CRM; Beheregaray LB; Möller LM
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; 18(3):381-390. PubMed ID: 29160928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the genome-wide kinship coefficient seems unhelpful in distinguishing consanguineous couples with a high versus low risk for adverse reproductive outcome.
Kelmemi W; Teeuw ME; Bochdanovits Z; Ouburg S; Jonker MA; Alkuraya F; Hashem M; Kayserili H; van Haeringen A; Sheridan E; Masri A; Cobben JM; Rizzu P; Kostense PJ; Dommering CJ; Henneman L; Bouhamed-Chaabouni H; Heutink P; Ten Kate LP; Cornel MC
BMC Med Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():50. PubMed ID: 26188928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benchmarking kinship estimation tools for ancient genomes using pedigree simulations.
Aktürk Ş; Mapelli I; Güler MN; Gürün K; Katırcıoğlu B; Vural KB; Sağlıcan E; Çetin M; Yaka R; Sürer E; Atağ G; Çokoğlu SS; Sevkar A; Altınışık NE; Koptekin D; Somel M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jul; 24(5):e13960. PubMed ID: 38676702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating Genetic Relatedness in Admixed Populations.
Sethuraman A
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Oct; 8(10):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 30104261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
