696 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28544582)
1. Evaluation by medical students of the educational value of multi-material and multi-colored three-dimensional printed models of the upper limb for anatomical education.
Mogali SR; Yeong WY; Tan HKJ; Tan GJS; Abrahams PH; Zary N; Low-Beer N; Ferenczi MA
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 28544582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of plastinated prosections for teaching anatomy--the view of medical students on the value of this learning resource.
Fruhstorfer BH; Palmer J; Brydges S; Abrahams PH
Clin Anat; 2011 Mar; 24(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 21322047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education.
Smith CF; Tollemache N; Covill D; Johnston M
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 28753247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do Three-dimensional Visualization and Three-dimensional Printing Improve Hepatic Segment Anatomy Teaching? A Randomized Controlled Study.
Kong X; Nie L; Zhang H; Wang Z; Ye Q; Tang L; Li J; Huang W
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 26868314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomy Learning from Prosected Cadaveric Specimens Versus Plastic Models: A Comparative Study of Upper Limb Anatomy.
Mitrousias V; Karachalios TS; Varitimidis SE; Natsis K; Arvanitis DL; Zibis AH
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Jul; 13(4):436-444. PubMed ID: 31251473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a three-dimensional printed heart from computed tomography images of a plastinated specimen for learning anatomy.
Radzi S; Tan HKJ; Tan GJS; Yeong WY; Ferenczi MA; Low-Beer N; Mogali SR
Anat Cell Biol; 2020 Mar; 53(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 32274249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D-Printed specimens as a valuable tool in anatomy education: A pilot study.
Garas M; Vaccarezza M; Newland G; McVay-Doornbusch K; Hasani J
Ann Anat; 2018 Sep; 219():57-64. PubMed ID: 29883617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effects of a Functional Three-dimensional (3D) Printed Knee Joint Simulator in Improving Anatomical Spatial Knowledge.
Cai B; Rajendran K; Bay BH; Lee J; Yen CC
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):610-618. PubMed ID: 30536570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital preservation of anatomical variation: 3D-modeling of embalmed and plastinated cadaveric specimens using uCT and MRI.
Moore CW; Wilson TD; Rice CL
Ann Anat; 2017 Jan; 209():69-75. PubMed ID: 27777116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the effectiveness of three-dimensionally printed anatomical models compared with plastinated human specimens in learning cardiac and neck anatomy: A randomized crossover study.
Mogali SR; Chandrasekaran R; Radzi S; Peh ZK; Tan GJS; Rajalingam P; Yee Yeong W
Anat Sci Educ; 2022 Nov; 15(6):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 34363315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anatomy learning from prosected cadaveric specimens versus three-dimensional software: A comparative study of upper limb anatomy.
Mitrousias V; Varitimidis SE; Hantes ME; Malizos KN; Arvanitis DL; Zibis AH
Ann Anat; 2018 Jul; 218():156-164. PubMed ID: 29669259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional printing of X-ray computed tomography datasets with multiple materials using open-source data processing.
Sander IM; McGoldrick MT; Helms MN; Betts A; van Avermaete A; Owers E; Doney E; Liepert T; Niebur G; Liepert D; Leevy WM
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):383-391. PubMed ID: 28231405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional printing in anatomy teaching: current evidence.
Chytas D; Johnson EO; Piagkou M; Tsakotos G; Babis GC; Nikolaou VS; Markatos K; Natsis K
Surg Radiol Anat; 2020 Jul; 42(7):835-841. PubMed ID: 32346753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Novel dissection of the central nervous system to bridge gross anatomy and neuroscience for an integrated medical curriculum.
Hlavac RJ; Klaus R; Betts K; Smith SM; Stabio ME
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Mar; 11(2):185-195. PubMed ID: 28817239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Production of accurate skeletal models of domestic animals using three-dimensional scanning and printing technology.
Li F; Liu C; Song X; Huan Y; Gao S; Jiang Z
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 28914982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology.
McMenamin PG; Quayle MR; McHenry CR; Adams JW
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(6):479-86. PubMed ID: 24976019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of virtual reality anatomy models to prosections in station-based anatomy teaching.
Ail G; Freer F; Chan CS; Jones M; Broad J; Canale GP; Elston P; Leeney J; Vickerton P
Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Jun; 17(4):763-769. PubMed ID: 38584323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Students' learning experiences of three-dimensional printed models and plastinated specimens: a qualitative analysis.
Radzi S; Chandrasekaran R; Peh ZK; Rajalingam P; Yeong WY; Mogali SR
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Sep; 22(1):695. PubMed ID: 36171608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures.
Peterson DC; Mlynarczyk GS
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Impact of Three-Dimensional Printed Anatomical Models on First-Year Student Engagement in a Block Mode Delivery.
Tripodi N; Kelly K; Husaric M; Wospil R; Fleischmann M; Johnston S; Harkin K
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Nov; 13(6):769-777. PubMed ID: 32163665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
