These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28545519)

  • 1. Staff's normative attitudes towards coercion: the role of moral doubt and professional context-a cross-sectional survey study.
    Molewijk B; Kok A; Husum T; Pedersen R; Aasland O
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 28545519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Role of Ethics in Reducing and Improving the Quality of Coercion in Mental Health Care.
    Norvoll R; Hem MH; Pedersen R
    HEC Forum; 2017 Mar; 29(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 27743277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two years of ethics reflection groups about coercion in psychiatry. Measuring variation within employees' normative attitudes, user involvement and the handling of disagreement.
    Molewijk B; Pedersen R; Kok A; Førde R; Aasland O
    BMC Med Ethics; 2023 May; 24(1):29. PubMed ID: 37173770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The significance of ethics reflection groups in mental health care: a focus group study among health care professionals.
    Hem MH; Molewijk B; Gjerberg E; Lillemoen L; Pedersen R
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):54. PubMed ID: 29871682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals' priorities.
    Svantesson M; de Snoo-Trimp JC; Ursin G; de Vet HC; Brinchmann BS; Molewijk B
    J Med Ethics; 2019 Sep; 45(9):608-616. PubMed ID: 31320403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS): reliability, validity and feasibility.
    Husum TL; Finset A; Ruud T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):417-22. PubMed ID: 18817973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical challenges in connection with the use of coercion: a focus group study of health care personnel in mental health care.
    Hem MH; Molewijk B; Pedersen R
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Dec; 15():82. PubMed ID: 25475895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mental health professionals' attitudes towards people with mental illness: do they differ from attitudes held by people with mental illness?
    Hansson L; Jormfeldt H; Svedberg P; Svensson B
    Int J Soc Psychiatry; 2013 Feb; 59(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 21954319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informal coercion in acute inpatient setting--knowledge and attitudes held by mental health professionals.
    Jaeger M; Ketteler D; Rabenschlag F; Theodoridou A
    Psychiatry Res; 2014 Dec; 220(3):1007-11. PubMed ID: 25249438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Staff attitudes and thoughts about the use of coercion in acute psychiatric wards.
    Husum TL; Bjørngaard JH; Finset A; Ruud T
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):893-901. PubMed ID: 20596695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Good coercion: patients' moral evaluation of coercion in mental health care.
    Lorem GF; Hem MH; Molewijk B
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2015 Jun; 24(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 25394674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Knowledge on types of treatment pressure. A cross-sectional study among mental health professionals.
    Schori D; Jaeger M; Elmer T; Jaeger S; Mahlke C; Heumann K; Theodoridou A; Zuaboni G; Kozel B; Rabenschlag F
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2018 Oct; 32(5):662-669. PubMed ID: 30201193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Between authoritarian and dialogical approaches: Attitudes and opinions on coercion among professionals in mental health and addiction care in Norway.
    Aasland OG; Husum TL; Førde R; Pedersen R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 57():106-112. PubMed ID: 29548497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlates of psychiatric staff's attitude toward coercion and their sociodemographic characteristics.
    Al-Maraira OA; Hayajneh FA
    Nurs Forum; 2020 Nov; 55(4):603-610. PubMed ID: 32497275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mental health professionals' feelings and attitudes towards coercion.
    Morandi S; Silva B; Mendez Rubio M; Bonsack C; Golay P
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 74():101665. PubMed ID: 33401095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attitudinal variance among patients, next of kin and health care professionals towards the use of containment measures in three psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland.
    Hotzy F; Jaeger M; Buehler E; Moetteli S; Klein G; Beeri S; Reisch T
    BMC Psychiatry; 2019 Apr; 19(1):128. PubMed ID: 31035954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS) - Polish adaptation.
    Kiejna A; Jakubczyk MH; Gondek TM; Rajba B
    Psychiatr Pol; 2020 Feb; 54(1):113-124. PubMed ID: 32447360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Moral case deliberation about coercion in psychiatry. Dilemmas, value and implementation].
    Voskes Y; Evenblij K; Noorthoorn E; Porz R; Widdershoven G
    Psychiatr Prax; 2014 Oct; 41(7):364-70. PubMed ID: 25295977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patients' moral views on coercion in mental healthcare.
    Norvoll R; Pedersen R
    Nurs Ethics; 2018 Sep; 25(6):796-807. PubMed ID: 27789846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Some missions can be quite emotionally painful." Paramedic´s experience exercising coercion during assignments-A qualitative study.
    Bergem AK; Thorvaldsen NØ; Häikiö K; Olsen-Bergem H
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0290593. PubMed ID: 38165987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.