585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28546331)
21. Diagnostic utility of metabolic parameters on FDG PET/CT for lymph node metastasis in patients with cN2 non-small cell lung cancer.
Nakanishi K; Nakamura S; Sugiyama T; Kadomatsu Y; Ueno H; Goto M; Ozeki N; Fukui T; Iwano S; Chen-Yoshikawa TF
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):983. PubMed ID: 34474680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
Ishihara S; Kawai K; Tanaka T; Kiyomatsu T; Hata K; Nozawa H; Morikawa T; Watanabe T
Tech Coloproctol; 2018 May; 22(5):347-354. PubMed ID: 29623475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography for the detection of groin node metastases from vulvar cancer.
Cohn DE; Dehdashti F; Gibb RK; Mutch DG; Rader JS; Siegel BA; Herzog TJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Apr; 85(1):179-84. PubMed ID: 11925141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic performance of
Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Factors affecting the accuracy of
Kutluturk K; Simsek A; Comak A; Gonultas F; Unal B; Kekilli E
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jan; 22(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 30666022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of 68Ga-DOTANOC and 18F-FDG PET-CT Scans in the Evaluation of Primary Tumors and Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Zhou Z; Wang Z; Zhang B; Wu Y; Li G; Wang Z
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():727327. PubMed ID: 34539577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic Value of
Voskuilen CS; Schweitzer D; Jensen JB; Nielsen AM; Joniau S; Muilwijk T; Necchi A; Azizi M; Spiess PE; Briganti A; Bandini M; Goffin K; Bouchelouche K; van Werkhoven E; Shariat SF; Xylinas E; Azawi NH; Ku JH; Foerster B; van Rhijn BWG; Vegt E; Hendricksen K
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 31591037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Significance of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET imaging in evaluation of hilar and mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer].
Hu M; Yu JM; Liu NB; Liu LP; Guo HB; Yang GR; Zhang PL; Xu XQ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 30(4):306-9. PubMed ID: 18788639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lymph node staging in non-small-cell lung cancer with FDG-PET scan: a prospective study on 690 lymph node stations from 68 patients.
Vansteenkiste JF; Stroobants SG; De Leyn PR; Dupont PJ; Bogaert J; Maes A; Deneffe GJ; Nackaerts KL; Verschakelen JA; Lerut TE; Mortelmans LA; Demedts MG
J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jun; 16(6):2142-9. PubMed ID: 9626214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prospective evaluation of hybrid 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in staging clinically node-negative patients with penile carcinoma.
Leijte JA; Graafland NM; Valdés Olmos RA; van Boven HH; Hoefnagel CA; Horenblas S
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):640-4. PubMed ID: 19281465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic and prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in patients with breast cancer.
Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Katsuura T; Igarashi Y; Kawanaka Y; Mouri M; Maruyama K; Yamano T; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S; Hirota S
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Mar; 34(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 26715510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer.
Kim HJ; Cho A; Yun M; Kim YT; Kang WJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 26546334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose FDG-PET/CT better than ct alone for the preoperative lymph node staging of muscle invasive bladder cancer?
Uttam M; Pravin N; Anish B; Nandita K; Arup M
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 27256176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT tumor markers outperform MRI-based markers for the prediction of lymph node metastases in primary endometrial cancer.
Fasmer KE; Gulati A; Dybvik JA; Ytre-Hauge S; Salvesen Ø; Trovik J; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2443-2453. PubMed ID: 32034487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preoperative 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/CT in Prediction of Uterine Risk Factors and Lymph Node Metastasis: An Analysis of 111 Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer Patients.
Konuralp Atakul B; Taşkın S; Soydal Ç; Sükür YE; Kahraman A; Koyuncu K; İbiş E; Ortac F
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(4):340-348. PubMed ID: 27771729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic role of F-18 FDG PET/CT for preoperative lymph node staging in thyroid cancer patients; A systematic review and metaanalysis.
Kim DH; Kim SJ
Clin Imaging; 2020 Sep; 65():100-107. PubMed ID: 32387798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Combination of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) and Tumor Markers to Diagnose Lymph Node Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Retrospective and Prospective Study.
Zhai X; Guo Y; Qian X
Med Sci Monit; 2020 Jun; 26():e922675. PubMed ID: 32483109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.
Hahn S; Hecktor J; Grabellus F; Hartung V; Pöppel T; Kimmig R; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):518-23. PubMed ID: 22547387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39.
Bae MR; Roh JL; Kim JS; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 146(1):237-244. PubMed ID: 31606761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Preoperative lymph-node staging of invasive urothelial bladder cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with histopathology.
Jensen TK; Holt P; Gerke O; Riehmann M; Svolgaard B; Marcussen N; Bouchelouche K
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 21231796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
