These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28547023)

  • 1. Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies.
    Wahlberg N; Klemetti T; Selonen V; Hanski I
    Oecologia; 2002 Jan; 130(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 28547023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do all inter-patch movements represent dispersal? A mixed kernel study of butterfly mobility in fragmented landscapes.
    Hovestadt T; Binzenhöfer B; Nowicki P; Settele J
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Sep; 80(5):1070-7. PubMed ID: 21585369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Area-dependent migration by ringlet butterflies generates a mixture of patchy population and metapopulation attributes.
    Sutcliffe OL; Thomas CD; Peggie D
    Oecologia; 1997 Jan; 109(2):229-234. PubMed ID: 28307173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Migration of moth species in a network of small islands.
    Nieminen M
    Oecologia; 1996 Dec; 108(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 28307797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic differentiation within metapopulations of Euphydryas aurinia and Melitaea phoebe in China.
    Wang R; Wang Y; Lei G; Xu R; Painter J
    Biochem Genet; 2003 Apr; 41(3-4):107-18. PubMed ID: 12670025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes.
    Schtickzelle N; Baguette M
    J Anim Ecol; 2003 Jul; 72(4):533-545. PubMed ID: 30893963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metapopulation-level adaptation of insect host plant preference and extinction-colonization dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes.
    Hanski I; Heino M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Nov; 64(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 14522169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimum area requirements for an at-risk butterfly based on movement and demography.
    Brown LM; Crone EE
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 26174312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes.
    Thomas JA; Bourn NA; Clarke RT; Stewart KE; Simcox DJ; Pearman GS; Curtis R; Goodger B
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Sep; 268(1478):1791-6. PubMed ID: 11522197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model.
    Heino M; Hanski I
    Am Nat; 2001 May; 157(5):495-511. PubMed ID: 18707258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From individual behavior to metapopulation dynamics: unifying the patchy population and classic metapopulation models.
    Ovaskainen O; Hanski I
    Am Nat; 2004 Sep; 164(3):364-77. PubMed ID: 15478091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian methods for analyzing movements in heterogeneous landscapes from mark-recapture data.
    Ovaskainen O; Rekola H; Meyke E; Arjas E
    Ecology; 2008 Feb; 89(2):542-54. PubMed ID: 18409443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex-biased topography effects on butterfly dispersal.
    Plazio E; Bubová T; Vrabec V; Nowicki P
    Mov Ecol; 2020 Dec; 8(1):50. PubMed ID: 33317641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of cultivating croplands and grazing in arid grassland habitats on the conservation of melitaeine butterflies in a mountainous area in northern China.
    Wang Y; Chen J; Liu W; Xu R
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2007 Feb; 50(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17393081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-segregation in heterogeneous metapopulation landscapes.
    de Kemmeter JF; Carletti T; Asllani M
    J Theor Biol; 2022 Dec; 554():111271. PubMed ID: 36075456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual variation changes dispersal distance and area requirements of a checkerspot butterfly.
    Brown LM; Crone EE
    Ecology; 2016 Jan; 97(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 27008780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-dependent survival analyzed with Bayesian models of mark-recapture data.
    Zheng C; Ovaskainen O; Saastamoinen M; Hanski I
    Ecology; 2007 Aug; 88(8):1970-6. PubMed ID: 17824428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response of butterflies to structural and resource boundaries.
    Schultz CB; Franco AM; Crone EE
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 May; 81(3):724-34. PubMed ID: 22272654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual Range, Targeting Ability, and Visual Habitat Detection by Greater Fritillary Butterflies Speyeria cybele (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) and Speyeria atlantis.
    MacDonald ZG; Acorn JH; Zhang J; Nielsen SE
    J Insect Sci; 2019 Jul; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 31254380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Higher mobility of butterflies than moths connected to habitat suitability and body size in a release experiment.
    Kuussaari M; Saarinen M; Korpela EL; Pöyry J; Hyvönen T
    Ecol Evol; 2014 Oct; 4(19):3800-11. PubMed ID: 25614794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.