These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28547660)
1. Rib Geometry Explains Variation in Dynamic Structural Response: Potential Implications for Frontal Impact Fracture Risk. Murach MM; Kang YS; Goldman SD; Schafman MA; Schlecht SH; Moorhouse K; Bolte JH; Agnew AM Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Sep; 45(9):2159-2173. PubMed ID: 28547660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detailed subject-specific FE rib modeling for fracture prediction. Iraeus J; Lundin L; Storm S; Agnew A; Kang YS; Kemper A; Albert D; Holcombe S; Pipkorn B Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S88-S95. PubMed ID: 31589083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sources of Variability in Structural Bending Response of Pediatric and Adult Human Ribs in Dynamic Frontal Impacts. Agnew AM; Murach MM; Dominguez VM; Sreedhar A; Misicka E; Harden A; Bolte JH; Kang YS; Stammen J; Moorhouse K Stapp Car Crash J; 2018 Nov; 62():119-192. PubMed ID: 30608995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Population trends in human rib cross-sectional shapes. Holcombe SA; Huang Y; Derstine BA J Anat; 2024 May; 244(5):792-802. PubMed ID: 38200705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Real-World Rib Fracture Patterns in Frontal Crashes in Different Restraint Conditions. Lee EL; Craig M; Scarboro M Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S115-23. PubMed ID: 26436220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age and sex alone are insufficient to predict human rib structural response to dynamic A-P loading. Schafman MA; Kang YS; Moorhouse K; White SE; Bolte JH; Agnew AM J Biomech; 2016 Oct; 49(14):3516-3522. PubMed ID: 27717546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of age on the structural properties of human ribs. Agnew AM; Schafman M; Moorhouse K; White SE; Kang YS J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Jan; 41():302-14. PubMed ID: 25260951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing FE human body model rib geometry to population data. Holcombe SA; Agnew AM; Derstine B; Wang SC Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Dec; 19(6):2227-2239. PubMed ID: 32444978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of mesh density, cortical thickness and material properties on human rib fracture prediction. Li Z; Kindig MW; Subit D; Kent RW Med Eng Phys; 2010 Nov; 32(9):998-1008. PubMed ID: 20674456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel ex vivo model of compressive immature rib fractures at pathophysiological rates of loading. Beadle N; Burnett TL; Hoyland JA; Sherratt MJ; Freemont AJ J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Nov; 51():154-62. PubMed ID: 26253206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical response of ribs under quasistatic frontal loading. Kindig M; Lau AG; Kent RW Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):377-87. PubMed ID: 21823946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regional maps of rib cortical bone thickness and cross-sectional geometry. Holcombe SA; Kang YS; Derstine BA; Wang SC; Agnew AM J Anat; 2019 Nov; 235(5):883-891. PubMed ID: 31225915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element models of rib as an inhomogeneous beam structure under high-speed impacts. Niu Y; Shen W; Stuhmiller JH Med Eng Phys; 2007 Sep; 29(7):788-98. PubMed ID: 17045511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variation in the human ribs geometrical properties and mechanical response based on X-ray computed tomography images resolution. Perz R; Toczyski J; Subit D J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Jan; 41():292-301. PubMed ID: 25153615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]