These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28547944)
1. Applying Additive Hazards Models for Analyzing Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer in Fars Province, Southern Iran. Madadizadeh F; Ghanbarnejad A; Ghavami V; Zare Bandamiri M; Mohammadianpanah M Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Apr; 18(4):1077-1083. PubMed ID: 28547944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Aalen's additive and Cox proportional hazards models for breast cancer survival: analysis of population- based data from British Columbia, Canada. Abadi A; Saadat S; Yavari P; Bajdik C; Jalili P Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):3113-6. PubMed ID: 22393999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of additive hazards models for analyzing survival of breast cancer patients. Ataee Dizaji P; Vasheghani Farahani M; Sheikhaliyan A; Biglarian A J Res Med Sci; 2020; 25():99. PubMed ID: 33273944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of the affective factors on the survival rate of patients with laryngeal cancer using Cox proportional hazards and Lin -Ying's additive hazards models. Zarei M; Mirzaee M; Alizadeh H; Jahani Y Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2021; 35():16. PubMed ID: 33996667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients using additive hazards regression models. Maroufizadeh S; Hajizadeh E; Baghestani AR; Fatemi SR Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1697-702. PubMed ID: 22126547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients using additive hazards regression models. Maroufizadeh S; Hajizadeh E; Baghestani AR; Fatemi SR Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):901-7. PubMed ID: 21790223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fitting semiparametric additive hazards models using standard statistical software. Schaubel DE; Wei G Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):719-30. PubMed ID: 17638295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A strategy for optimal fitting of multiplicative and additive hazards regression models. Lefebvre F; Giorgi R BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):100. PubMed ID: 33957858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of breast cancer survival among young, middle-aged, and elderly patients in southern Iran using Cox and empirical Bayesian additive hazard models. Nematolahi S; Ayatollahi SMT Epidemiol Health; 2017; 39():e2017043. PubMed ID: 29056033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison between Accelerated Failure-time and Cox Proportional Hazard Models in Analyzing the Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients. Zare A; Hosseini M; Mahmoodi M; Mohammad K; Zeraati H; Holakouie Naieni K Iran J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 44(8):1095-102. PubMed ID: 26587473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Additive hazard regression models: an application to the natural history of human papillomavirus. Xie X; Strickler HD; Xue X Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():796270. PubMed ID: 23424606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival analysis of breast cancer patients using Cox and frailty models. Faradmal J; Talebi A; Rezaianzadeh A; Mahjub H J Res Health Sci; 2012 Dec; 12(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 23241526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the results of Cox proportional hazards model and parametric models in the study of length of stay in a tertiary teaching hospital in Tehran, Iran. Ravangard R; Arab M; Rashidian A; Akbarisari A; Zare A; Zeraati H Acta Med Iran; 2011; 49(10):650-8. PubMed ID: 22071639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors Affecting Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer in Shiraz, Iran. Zare-Bandamiri M; Khanjani N; Jahani Y; Mohammadianpanah M Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(1):159-63. PubMed ID: 26838203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using additive and relative hazards to quantify colorectal survival inequalities for patients with a severe psychiatric illness. Mahar AL; Davis LE; Kurdyak P; Hanna TP; Coburn NG; Groome PA Ann Epidemiol; 2021 Apr; 56():70-74. PubMed ID: 33239182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing the proportional hazards assumption in case-cohort analysis. Xue X; Xie X; Gunter M; Rohan TE; Wassertheil-Smoller S; Ho GY; Cirillo D; Yu H; Strickler HD BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():88. PubMed ID: 23834739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing the proportional hazards assumption in cox regression and dealing with possible non-proportionality in total joint arthroplasty research: methodological perspectives and review. Kuitunen I; Ponkilainen VT; Uimonen MM; Eskelinen A; Reito A BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 May; 22(1):489. PubMed ID: 34049528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Cox and Gray's survival models in severe sepsis. Kasal J; Jovanovic Z; Clermont G; Weissfeld LA; Kaplan V; Watson RS; Angus DC Crit Care Med; 2004 Mar; 32(3):700-7. PubMed ID: 15090950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A note on testing in Aalen's additive hazards regression models. Bhattacharyya M; Klein JP Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(14):2235-40. PubMed ID: 15889453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]