192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28548475)
1. Patterns of use and durability for the Mitroflow aortic valve: a systematic review of the literature.
Fischlein T; Pfeiffer S; Bagnardi V; Santarpino G
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Dec; 58(6):916-930. PubMed ID: 28548475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients.
Nielsen PH; Hjortdal V; Modrau IS; Jensen H; Kimose HH; Terp K; Poulsen SH; Smerup M; Nielsen SL
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1705-10. PubMed ID: 26984983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in More Than 3,000 Consecutive Cases in the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantations.
Silaschi M; Conradi L; Treede H; Reiter B; Schaefer U; Blankenberg S; Reichenspurner H
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 64(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 26444659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mitroflow pericardial aortic bioprosthesis in patients younger than 60 years.
Yankah CA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 140(5):e83-4. PubMed ID: 20708752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement With Mitroflow or Perimount Prostheses.
Aasbjerg K; Mortensen PE; Nørgaard MA; Rytgaard HC; Gerds TA; Søgaard P; Torp-Pedersen C; Mortensen RN; Bagge BJ; Køber L; Nielsen PH
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019; 31(3):350-358. PubMed ID: 30529158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Population trends in aortic valve surgery in Finland between 2001 and 2016.
Myllykangas ME; Gunn JM; Pietilä A; Kiviniemi TO; Kytö V; Niiranen TJ; Salomaa VV; Aittokallio J
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2020 Feb; 54(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 31650870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Selection of Valve Prostheses.
Rosu C; Soltesz EG
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015; 27(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 26686441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population trends in mitral valve surgery in Finland between 1997 and 2014: the finnish CVD register.
Myllykangas ME; Aittokallio JM; Pietilä A; Salomaa VV; Gunn JM; Kiviniemi TO; Niiranen TJ
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2018 Feb; 52(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 29198154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the utilization and in-hospital outcomes of surgical mitral valve replacement in Spain (2001-2015).
López-de-Andrés A; de Miguel-Díez J; Muñoz-Rivas N; Hernández-Barrera V; Méndez-Bailón M; de Miguel-Yanes JM; Jiménez-García R
Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2019 May; 18(1):60. PubMed ID: 31077189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term results of the Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis in over 800 patients: limited durability and mechanisms of dysfunction.
Ius F; Schulz J; Roumieh M; Fleissner F; Ismail I; Tudorache I; Warnecke G; Martens A; Shrestha M; Boethig D; Haverich A; Cebotari S
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Aug; 52(2):264-271. PubMed ID: 28838100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemodynamic performance of mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis - optimizing management for the small aortic annulus.
Jamieson WR; Forgie WR; Hayden RI; Langlois Y; Ling H; Stanford EA; Roberts KA; Dolman WB
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Mar; 58(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 20333567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stented within a stentless aortic valve. A simple surgical solution for the replacement of a stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
Panagiotou M; Kogerakis N; Crockett JR; Economidou S
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jan; 10(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 19805504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do differences in early hemodynamic performance of current generation biologic aortic valves predict outcomes 1 year following surgery?
Thalji NM; Suri RM; Michelena HI; Greason KL; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Burkhart HM; Li Z; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 149(1):163-73.e2. PubMed ID: 25439772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mitroflow pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: an analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors.
Minami K; Boethig D; Mirow N; Kleikamp G; Koertke H; Godehardt E; Koerfer R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jan; 9(1):112-22. PubMed ID: 10678383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stentless vs Stented Aortic Valve Bioprostheses in the Small Aortic Root.
Wollersheim LW; Li WW; Kaya A; Bouma BJ; Driessen AH; van Boven WJ; van der Meulen J; de Mol BA
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Summer; 28(2):390-397. PubMed ID: 28043449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Balloon valuloplasty prior to transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in a degenerated Mitroflow aortic bioprosthesis.
Cerillo AG; Berti S; Glauber M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 81(6):1075-8. PubMed ID: 22744728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: 17 years' results.
Gansera B; Hapfelmeier A; Brandl K; Spiliopoulos K; Gundling F; Eichinger W
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 62(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 23817772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcome of the MitroFlow pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly after aortic valve replacement.
Sjögren J; Gudbjartsson T; Thulin LI
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Mar; 15(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 16607900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
