These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28549033)
21. Concordance of breast cancer biomarker testing in core needle biopsy and surgical specimens: A single institution experience. Slostad JA; Yun NK; Schad AE; Warrior S; Fogg LF; Rao R Cancer Med; 2022 Dec; 11(24):4954-4965. PubMed ID: 35733293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of HER2/neu Status by Immunohistochemistry Using Computer-Based Image Analysis and Correlation With Gene Amplification by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay: A 10-Year Experience and Impact of Test Standardization on Concordance Rate. Sarode VR; Xiang QD; Christie A; Collins R; Rao R; Leitch AM; Euhus D; Haley B Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Jul; 139(7):922-8. PubMed ID: 26125432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Breast cancer biomarkers in clinical testing: analysis of a UK national external quality assessment scheme for immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridisation database containing results from 199 300 patients. Dodson A; Parry S; Ibrahim M; Bartlett JM; Pinder S; Dowsett M; Miller K J Pathol Clin Res; 2018 Oct; 4(4):262-273. PubMed ID: 30066480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparing breast biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry and FISH studies and Oncotype DX testing, a study of 610 cases. Neely C; You S; Mendoza PM; Aneja R; Sahin AA; Li X Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):889-893. PubMed ID: 30230095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Variability of predictive markers (hormone receptors, Her2, Ki67) and intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer in four consecutive years 2015-2018. Stevanovic L; Choschzick M; Moskovszky L; Varga Z J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 Dec; 145(12):2983-2994. PubMed ID: 31628534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Re-testing of predictive biomarkers on surgical breast cancer specimens is clinically relevant. Robertson S; Rönnlund C; de Boniface J; Hartman J Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 174(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 30659433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status between core needle and open excision biopsy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Chen X; Yuan Y; Gu Z; Shen K Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Aug; 134(3):957-67. PubMed ID: 22370627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognostic values of negative estrogen or progesterone receptor expression in patients with luminal B HER2-negative breast cancer. Park C; Park K; Kim J; Sin Y; Park I; Cho H; Yang K; Bae BN; Kim KW; Ahn S; Gwak G World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 14(1):244. PubMed ID: 27619909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of prolonged fixation on the immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression in invasive breast cancer: a prospective study. Tong LC; Nelson N; Tsourigiannis J; Mulligan AM Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Apr; 35(4):545-52. PubMed ID: 21358301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the HER2, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression profile of primary tumor, metastases and circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer patients. Aktas B; Kasimir-Bauer S; Müller V; Janni W; Fehm T; Wallwiener D; Pantel K; Tewes M; BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():522. PubMed ID: 27456970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Routine assessment of hormonal receptor and her-2/neu status underscores the need for more therapeutic targets in Kenyan women with breast cancer. Nyagol J; Nyong'o A; Byakika B; Muchiri L; Cocco M; de Santi MM; Spina D; Bellan C; Lazzi S; Kostopoulos I; Luzi P; Leoncini L Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2006 Apr; 28(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16637512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Breast Cancer Survival Analysis Based on Immunohistochemistry Subtypes (ER/PR/HER2): a Retrospective Cohort Study. Poorolajal J; Nafissi N; Akbari ME; Mahjub H; Esmailnasab N; Babaee E Arch Iran Med; 2016 Oct; 19(10):680-686. PubMed ID: 27743431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in formalin-fixed breast carcinoma cell block preparations: correlation of results to corresponding tissue block (needle core and excision) samples. Kinsella MD; Birdsong GG; Siddiqui MT; Cohen C; Hanley KZ Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 22611048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Looking for more reliable biomarkers in breast cancer: Comparison between routine methods and RT-qPCR. Caselli E; Pelliccia C; Teti V; Bellezza G; Mandarano M; Ferri I; Hartmann K; Laible M; Sahin U; Varga Z; Lupi C; Stracci F; Sidoni A PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0255580. PubMed ID: 34555047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Folate Receptor Alpha Immunohistochemistry in Cytology Specimens of Metastatic Breast Carcinoma. Sheikh UN; Cohen C; Siddiqui MT Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 26413911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of Surface Decalcification With Hydrochloric Acid on the Determination of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, Ki67, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expressions in Invasive Breast Carcinoma Based on Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. Ping W; Xin R; Li Z; Yupeng C; Fangling S; Caihong R; Shun H; Sheng Z Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2023 Apr; 31(4):232-238. PubMed ID: 36883948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An international study comparing conventional versus mRNA level testing (TargetPrint) for ER, PR, and HER2 status of breast cancer. Wesseling J; Tinterri C; Sapino A; Zanconati F; Lutke-Holzik M; Nguyen B; Deck KB; Querzoli P; Perin T; Giardina C; Seitz G; Guinebretière JM; Barone J; Dekker L; de Snoo F; Stork-Sloots L; Roepman P; Watanabe T; Cusumano P Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 27377889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Decalcification of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases With EDTA Does Not Affect ER, PR, and HER2 Results. van Es SC; van der Vegt B; Bensch F; Gerritse S; van Helden EJ; Boon E; Angus L; Overbosch J; Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW; Verheul HM; van Herpen CML; Jager A; Oosting SF; de Vries EGE; Schröder CP Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 Oct; 43(10):1355-1360. PubMed ID: 31283631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinically used breast cancer markers such as estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 are unstable throughout tumor progression. Lindström LS; Karlsson E; Wilking UM; Johansson U; Hartman J; Lidbrink EK; Hatschek T; Skoog L; Bergh J J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jul; 30(21):2601-8. PubMed ID: 22711854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ductal invasive mammary carcinoma--clinicopathological prognostic factors related to immunohistochemical expression of hormonal receptors and Her2/neu oncoprotein. Recăreanu F; Simionescu C; Georgescu CV; Pirici E Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2011; 52(3 Suppl):1059-64. PubMed ID: 22119825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]