113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28549600)
1. Novel instrumented probe for measuring 3D pressure distribution along the vaginal canal.
Cacciari LP; Pássaro AC; Amorim AC; Geuder M; Sacco ICN
J Biomech; 2017 Jun; 58():139-146. PubMed ID: 28549600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High spatial resolution pressure distribution of the vaginal canal in Pompoir practitioners: A biomechanical approach for assessing the pelvic floor.
Cacciari LP; Pássaro AC; Amorim AC; Sacco ICN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Aug; 47():53-60. PubMed ID: 28600995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and validity of intravaginal pressure measurements with a new intravaginal pressure device: The FemFit®.
Cacciari LP; Kruger J; Goodman J; Budgett D; Dumoulin C
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Jan; 39(1):253-260. PubMed ID: 31588623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and reliability of an instrumented speculum designed to minimize the effect of intra-abdominal pressure on the measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength.
Ashton-Miller JA; Zielinski R; DeLancey JO; Miller JM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Dec; 29(10):1146-50. PubMed ID: 25307868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Comparative intra- and inter-rater reliability of maximal voluntary contraction with unidigital and bidigital vaginal palpation and construct validity with Peritron manometer".
Silva JBD; Sato TO; Rocha APR; Driusso P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Feb; 39(2):721-731. PubMed ID: 31873956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial distribution of vaginal closure pressures of continent and stress urinary incontinent women.
Peng Q; Jones R; Shishido K; Omata S; Constantinou CE
Physiol Meas; 2007 Nov; 28(11):1429-50. PubMed ID: 17978426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of pelvic floor muscle contraction on anal canal pressure.
Padda BS; Jung SA; Pretorius D; Nager CW; Den-Boer D; Mittal RK
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2007 Feb; 292(2):G565-71. PubMed ID: 17023551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The vaginal pressure profile.
Guaderrama NM; Nager CW; Liu J; Pretorius DH; Mittal RK
Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 15714439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of pelvic floor muscle contraction on the profile of vaginal closure pressure in continent and stress urinary incontinent women.
Shishido K; Peng Q; Jones R; Omata S; Constantinou CE
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1917-22. PubMed ID: 18353401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intravaginal pressure profile of continent and incontinent women.
Cacciari LP; Amorim AC; Pássaro AC; Dumoulin C; Sacco ICN
J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 99():109572. PubMed ID: 31931973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does vaginal closure force differ in the supine and standing positions?
Morgan DM; Kaur G; Hsu Y; Fenner DE; Guire K; Miller J; Ashton-Miller JA; Delancey JO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1722-8. PubMed ID: 15902185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic clinical measurements of voluntary vaginal contractions and autonomic vaginal reflexes.
Broens PM; Spoelstra SK; Weijmar Schultz WC
J Sex Med; 2014 Dec; 11(12):2966-75. PubMed ID: 25319815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the dynamic responses of female pelvic floor using a novel vaginal probe.
Constantinou CE; Omata S; Yoshimura Y; Peng Q
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Apr; 1101():297-315. PubMed ID: 17416919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in muscle activation patterns during pelvic floor muscle contraction and Valsalva maneuver.
Thompson JA; O'Sullivan PB; Briffa NK; Neumann P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2006; 25(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 16302270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A fiber-optic sensor-based device for the measurement of vaginal integrity in women.
Parkinson LA; Rosamilia A; Mukherjee S; Papageorgiou AW; Melendez-Munoz J; Werkmeister JA; Gargett CE; Arkwright JW
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Nov; 38(8):2264-2272. PubMed ID: 31385355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An automated intravaginal dynamometer: Reliability metrics and the impact of testing protocol on active and passive forces measured from the pelvic floor muscles.
Bérubé MÈ; Czyrnyj CS; McLean L
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Aug; 37(6):1875-1888. PubMed ID: 29635776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of lumbopelvic posture in pelvic floor muscle activation in continent women.
Capson AC; Nashed J; Mclean L
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2011 Feb; 21(1):166-77. PubMed ID: 20833070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and tools.
Frawley HC; Galea MP; Phillips BA; Sherburn M; Bø K
Neurourol Urodyn; 2006; 25(3):236-242. PubMed ID: 16299815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of pelvic floor muscle contractility: digital palpation versus 2D and 3D perineal ultrasound.
Albrich S; Steetskamp J; Knoechel SL; Porta S; Hoffmann G; Skala C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):839-43. PubMed ID: 26408007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement and reliability of pelvic floor measurements during contraction using three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound and virtual reality.
Speksnijder L; Rousian M; Steegers EA; Van Der Spek PJ; Koning AH; Steensma AB
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jul; 40(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 22045504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
