235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28549710)
1. Complication Rates Observed in Silicone and Polyurethane Catheters of Totally Implanted Central Venous Access Devices Implanted in the Upper Arm.
Busch JD; Vens M; Mahler C; Herrmann J; Adam G; Ittrich H
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1177-1183. PubMed ID: 28549710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polyurethane versus silicone catheters for central venous port devices implanted at the forearm.
Wildgruber M; Lueg C; Borgmeyer S; Karimov I; Braun U; Kiechle M; Meier R; Koehler M; Ettl J; Berger H
Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 59():113-124. PubMed ID: 27023050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective randomized comparative evaluation of proximal valve polyurethane and distal valve silicone peripherally inserted central catheters.
Ong CK; Venkatesh SK; Lau GB; Wang SC
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1191-6. PubMed ID: 20598573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture of totally implanted central venous access devices: a propensity-score-matched comparison of risks for Groshong silicone versus polyurethane catheters.
Kojima S; Hiraki T; Gobara H; Iguchi T; Fujiwara H; Matsui Y; Mitsuhashi T; Kanazawa S
J Vasc Access; 2016 Nov; 17(6):535-541. PubMed ID: 27768210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of radiologically implanted central venous port systems explanted due to complications.
Teichgräber UK; Kausche S; Nagel SN
J Vasc Access; 2011; 12(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 21534232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility and safety of endovascular stripping of totally implantable venous access devices.
Heye S; Maleux G; Goossens GA; Vaninbroukx J; Jerôme M; Stas M
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):607-12. PubMed ID: 21479744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experience at a single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical complications caused by implanted central venous access devices in pediatric and adult patients.
Bessoud B; de Baere T; Kuoch V; Desruennes E; Cosset MF; Lassau N; Roche A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Feb; 180(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 12540466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days.
Busch JD; Herrmann J; Heller F; Derlin T; Koops A; Adam G; Habermann CR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 22826411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications Associated With Totally Implanted Venous Access Devices in the Arm Versus the Chest: A Short-Term Retrospective Study.
Pike S; Tan K; Burbridge B
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2022 Aug; 73(3):581-588. PubMed ID: 34911380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Silicone and polyurethane tunneled infusion catheters: a comparison of durability and breakage rates.
Cohen AB; Dagli M; Stavropoulos SW; Mondschein JI; Soulen MC; Shlansky-Goldberg RD; Solomon JA; Chittams JL; Trerotola SO
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 May; 22(5):638-41. PubMed ID: 21514517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience with 100 consecutive central venous access arm ports placed by interventional radiologists.
Hills JR; Cardella JF; Cardella K; Waybill PN
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1997; 8(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 9399467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polyurethane II catheter as long-indwelling intravenous catheter in patients with cancer.
Volkow P; Vázquez C; Téllez O; Aguilar C; Barrera L; Rodrgíuez E; Vilar-Compte D; Zinser J; Calderón E; Pérez-Padilla JR; Mohar A
Am J Infect Control; 2003 Nov; 31(7):392-6. PubMed ID: 14639434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception.
Plumhans C; Mahnken AH; Ocklenburg C; Keil S; Behrendt FF; Günther RW; Schoth F
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Sep; 79(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 20227211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Catheter fracture and embolization in a totally implanted venous access catheter.
Franey T; DeMarco LC; Geiss AC; Ward RJ
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1988; 12(5):528-30. PubMed ID: 3184427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Infectious and non-infectious complications of tunneled central catheters in hematologic patients].
Albo López C; López Rodríguez D; Constenla Camba MI; Jimenéz Blanco A; Araujo LF; García-Medina J
Sangre (Barc); 1999 Jun; 44(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10481577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term follow-up of upper extremity implanted venous access devices in oncology patients.
Lyon RD; Griggs KA; Johnson AM; Olsen JR
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Apr; 10(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 10229476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence of central vein stenosis and occlusion following upper extremity PICC and port placement.
Gonsalves CF; Eschelman DJ; Sullivan KL; DuBois N; Bonn J
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2003; 26(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 12616419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peripherally placed totally implantable venous-access port systems of the forearm: clinical experience in 763 consecutive patients.
Goltz JP; Scholl A; Ritter CO; Wittenberg G; Hahn D; Kickuth R
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Dec; 33(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 20414657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective evaluation of totally implantable venous access port devices: early and late complications.
Gurkan S; Seber S; Gur O; Yetisyigit T; Okan Donbaloglu M; Ozkaramanli Gur D
J BUON; 2015; 20(1):338-45. PubMed ID: 25778336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term Outcome of Peripherally Implanted Venous Access Ports in the Forearm in Female Cancer Patients.
Klösges L; Meyer C; Boschewitz J; Andersson M; Rudlowski C; Schild HH; Wilhelm K
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2015 Jun; 38(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 25209595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
