234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28549710)
21. The natural history of tunneled hemodialysis catheters removed or exchanged: a single-institution experience.
Alomari AI; Falk A
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 17327555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Complications of indwelling venous access devices in cancer patients.
Eastridge BJ; Lefor AT
J Clin Oncol; 1995 Jan; 13(1):233-8. PubMed ID: 7799025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Arm mobilization provokes deformity of long-term indwelling ports implanted via the jugular vein.
Leiderman DBD; Souza KP; Binatti CET; Mendes CA; Teivelis MP; Brito CF; Leiderman DBD; Wolosker N
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):998-1006. PubMed ID: 33130283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Comparison Between Upper Arm and Chest for Optimal Site of Totally Implanted Venous Access Ports in Patients with Female Breast Cancer.
Yang SS; Ahn MS
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Jul; 50():128-134. PubMed ID: 29481918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Polyurethane versus silicone port a cath: What's going on at removal?
Alzahrani K; Lejeune J; Lakhal W; Morel B; Cook AR; Braïk K; Lardy H; Binet A
J Pediatr Surg; 2018 Jul; 53(7):1417-1419. PubMed ID: 28689888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A retrospective analysis on the utility and complications of upper arm ports in 433 cases at a single institute.
Mori Y; Nagayama S; Kawamura J; Hasegawa S; Tanaka E; Okabe H; Takeuchi M; Sonobe M; Matsumoto S; Kanai M; Muto M; Chiba T; Sakai Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 21(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 26507141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ionic implantation of silicone chronic venous access devices does not alter thrombotic complications: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Frank JL; Garb JL; Halla B; Reed WP
Surgery; 2001 May; 129(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 11331446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Catheter embolization from implanted venous access devices: case reports.
Carr ME
Angiology; 1989 Apr; 40(4 Pt 1):319-23. PubMed ID: 2705640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Tunneled internal jugular catheters in adult patients: comparison of outcomes in hemodialysis versus infusion catheters.
Peynircioglu B; Ozkan F; Canyigit M; Cil BE; Balkanci F
Acta Radiol; 2007 Jul; 48(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 17611867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Complications of indwelling venous access devices in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Estes JM; Rocconi R; Straughn JM; Bhoola S; Leath CA; Alvarez RD; Kilgore LC; Huh WK
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Dec; 91(3):591-5. PubMed ID: 14675682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Complete catheter disconnection and migration of an implantable venous access device: the disconnected cap sign.
Faraj W; Zaghal A; El-Beyrouthy O; Kutoubi A
Ann Vasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 24(5):692.e11-5. PubMed ID: 20413259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Central venous catheters in home infusion care: outcomes analysis in 50,470 patients.
Moureau N; Poole S; Murdock MA; Gray SM; Semba CP
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2002 Oct; 13(10):1009-16. PubMed ID: 12397122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparative study of polyurethane and silicone cuffed-catheters in long-term home total parenteral nutrition patients.
Beau P; Matrat S
Clin Nutr; 1999 Jun; 18(3):175-7. PubMed ID: 10451475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A rare complication of implanted central-venous access devices: catheter fracture and embolization.
Debets JM; Wils JA; Schlangen JT
Support Care Cancer; 1995 Nov; 3(6):432-4. PubMed ID: 8564351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Material Failure of Silicone Catheter Lines: A Retrospective Review of Partial and Complete Ruptures in 553 Patients.
Busch JD; Vens M; Herrmann J; Adam G; Ittrich H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):464-469. PubMed ID: 27824502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Replacement of inadvertently discontinued tunneled jugular high-flow central catheters with tract recannulation: technical results and outcome.
Saad NE; Saad WE; Davies MG; Waldman DL
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):890-6. PubMed ID: 18503904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Complications and Complication-Related Removal of Arm-Situated Power-Injectable and Non-Power-Injectable Totally Implanted Venous Access Devices among Cancer Patients.
Burbridge B; Plewes C; Stoneham G; Szkup P; Otani R; Babyn P; Bryce R
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 May; 29(5):648-656.e3. PubMed ID: 29499999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Radiological placement of peripheral central venous access ports at the forearm. Technical results and long term outcome in 391 patients].
Lenhart M; Schätzler S; Manke C; Strotzer M; Seitz J; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Herold T; Paetzel C
Rofo; 2010 Jan; 182(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19536729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Totally implantable venous access devices in children with cystic fibrosis: incidence and type of complications.
Deerojanawong J; Sawyer SM; Fink AM; Stokes KB; Robertson CF
Thorax; 1998 Apr; 53(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 9741372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Infectious complications of 393 peripherally implantable venous access devices in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients.
Whigham CJ; Goodman CJ; Fisher RG; Greenbaum MC; Thornby JI; Thomas JW
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Jan; 10(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 10872493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
