These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28549870)

  • 1. Accuracy of Cyst Versus Solid Diagnosis in the Breast Using Quantitative Transmission (QT) Ultrasound.
    Iuanow E; Smith K; Obuchowski NA; Bullen J; Klock JC
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1148-1153. PubMed ID: 28549870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Exploratory Multi-reader, Multi-case Study Comparing Transmission Ultrasound to Mammography on Recall Rates and Detection Rates for Breast Cancer Lesions.
    Malik B; Iuanow E; Klock J
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S10-S18. PubMed ID: 33281042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of Cystic Lesions by Spectral Mammography: Results of a Clinical Pilot Study.
    Erhard K; Kilburn-Toppin F; Willsher P; Moa E; Fredenberg E; Wieberneit N; Buelow T; Wallis MG
    Invest Radiol; 2016 May; 51(5):340-7. PubMed ID: 26741891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3D quantitative breast ultrasound analysis for differentiating fibroadenomas and carcinomas smaller than 1cm.
    Meel-van den Abeelen AS; Weijers G; van Zelst JC; Thijssen JM; Mann RM; de Korte CL
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():141-147. PubMed ID: 28189199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical performance of Siemens digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard supplementary mammography for the assessment of screen-detected soft-tissue abnormalities: a multi-reader study.
    Whelehan P; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Vinnicombe SJ; Hacker A; Jänsch A; Hapca A; Gray R; Jenkin M; Lowry K; Oeppen R; Reilly M; Stahnke M; Evans A
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):95.e9-95.e15. PubMed ID: 27737763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography.
    Cole EB; Toledano AY; Lundqvist M; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):916-22. PubMed ID: 22537503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
    Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasound vs. additional views and ultrasound for the assessment of screen-detected abnormalities: German multi-reader study.
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hacker A; Jänsch A; Kates R; Wulz-Horber S;
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Jul; 59(7):782-788. PubMed ID: 28929783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of knowledge of mammography findings on the accuracy of breast ultrasound in symptomatic women.
    Houssami N; Irwig L; Simpson JM; McKessar M; Blome S; Noakes J
    Breast J; 2005; 11(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 15871700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the effect of computer-aided classification of benign and malignant lesions on reader performance in automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound.
    Tan T; Platel B; Twellmann T; van Schie G; Mus R; Grivegnée A; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1381-8. PubMed ID: 24119350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Added value of one-view breast tomosynthesis combined with digital mammography according to reader experience.
    Thomassin-Naggara I; Perrot N; Dechoux S; Ribeiro C; Chopier J; de Bazelaire C
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Feb; 84(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 25467641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potential Use of American College of Radiology BI-RADS Mammography Atlas for Reporting and Assessing Lesions Detected on Dedicated Breast CT Imaging: Preliminary Study.
    Jung HK; Kuzmiak CM; Kim KW; Choi NM; Kim HJ; Langman EL; Yoon S; Steen D; Zeng D; Gao F
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1395-1401. PubMed ID: 28728854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interreader variability and predictive value of US descriptions of solid breast masses: pilot study.
    Arger PH; Sehgal CM; Conant EF; Zuckerman J; Rowling SE; Patton JA
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Apr; 8(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 11293782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving digital breast tomosynthesis reading time: A pilot multi-reader, multi-case study using concurrent Computer-Aided Detection (CAD).
    Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Levy L; Toubiana PR; Cohen-Scali F; Toledano AY; Boyer B
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 97():83-89. PubMed ID: 29153373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography.
    Kim SA; Chang JM; Cho N; Yi A; Moon WK
    Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 25741187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting.
    Tennant SL; James JJ; Cornford EJ; Chen Y; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Girio-Fragkoulakis C
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1148-55. PubMed ID: 27296475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasound Strain Elastography for Breast Lesions: Computer-Aided Evaluation With Quantifiable Elastographic Features.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Zhang X; Niu LL; Qian M; Wang CZ; Zheng HR; Zheng RQ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 28295467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: conventional US versus spatial compound imaging.
    Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Chung SY; Park SH; Park JM; Han BK; Choe YH; Cho G; Im JG
    Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):841-6. PubMed ID: 16304106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.