These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28549883)

  • 1. A non-iterative multi-scale approach for intensity inhomogeneity correction in MRI.
    George MM; Kalaivani S; Sudhakar MS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 42():43-59. PubMed ID: 28549883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust generative asymmetric GMM for brain MR image segmentation.
    Ji Z; Xia Y; Zheng Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Nov; 151():123-138. PubMed ID: 28946994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multisite reproducibility and test-retest reliability of the T1w/T2w-ratio: A comparison of processing methods.
    Nerland S; Jørgensen KN; Nordhøy W; Maximov II; Bugge RAB; Westlye LT; Andreassen OA; Geier OM; Agartz I
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 245():118709. PubMed ID: 34848300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A level set method based on domain transformation and bias correction for MRI brain tumor segmentation.
    Khosravanian A; Rahmanimanesh M; Keshavarzi P; Mozaffari S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2021 Mar; 352():109091. PubMed ID: 33515604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing.
    Madabhushi A; Udupa JK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):561-76. PubMed ID: 15889544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: a postmortem study.
    Ding H; Johnson T; Lin M; Le HQ; Ducote JL; Su MY; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):122305. PubMed ID: 24320536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MRI intensity inhomogeneity correction by combining intensity and spatial information.
    Vovk U; Pernus F; Likar B
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):4119-33. PubMed ID: 15470927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rough sets for bias field correction in MR images using contraharmonic mean and quantitative index.
    Banerjee A; Maji P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 32(11):2140-51. PubMed ID: 23912497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Method for bias field correction of brain T1-weighted magnetic resonance images minimizing segmentation error.
    Gispert JD; Reig S; Pascau J; Vaquero JJ; García-Barreno P; Desco M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 Jun; 22(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 15108301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intensity inhomogeneity correction for the breast sonogram: constrained fuzzy cell-based bipartitioning and polynomial surface modeling.
    Lee CY; Chou YH; Huang CS; Chang YC; Tiu CM; Chen CM
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5645-54. PubMed ID: 21158276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new bias field correction method combining N3 and FCM for improved segmentation of breast density on MRI.
    Lin M; Chan S; Chen JH; Chang D; Nie K; Chen ST; Lin CJ; Shih TC; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 21361169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An efficient level set method for simultaneous intensity inhomogeneity correction and segmentation of MR images.
    Ivanovska T; Laqua R; Wang L; Schenk A; Yoon JH; Hegenscheid K; Völzke H; Liebscher V
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2016 Mar; 48():9-20. PubMed ID: 26741125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multiscale and multiblock fuzzy C-means classification method for brain MR images.
    Yang X; Fei B
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2879-91. PubMed ID: 21815363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intensity inhomogeneity correction of multispectral MR images.
    Vovk U; Pernus F; Likar B
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16647862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MR image segmentation using a power transformation approach.
    Lee JD; Su HR; Cheng PE; Liou M; Aston JA; Tsai AC; Chen CY
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Jun; 28(6):894-905. PubMed ID: 19164075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective correction of intensity inhomogeneity with sparsity constraints in transform-domain: Application to brain MRI.
    George MM; Kalaivani S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 61():207-223. PubMed ID: 31009687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image-guided regularization level set evolution for MR image segmentation and bias field correction.
    Wang L; Pan C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jan; 32(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 24239334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning-based 3T brain MRI segmentation with guidance from 7T MRI labeling.
    Deng M; Yu R; Wang L; Shi F; Yap PT; Shen D;
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6588-6597. PubMed ID: 28054724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intensity inhomogeneity correction of MRI images using InhomoNet.
    Venkatesh V; Sharma N; Singh M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2020 Sep; 84():101748. PubMed ID: 32679471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A segmentation-based method improving the performance of N4 bias field correction on T2weighted MR imaging data of the prostate.
    Dovrou A; Nikiforaki K; Zaridis D; Manikis GC; Mylona E; Tachos N; Tsiknakis M; Fotiadis DI; Marias K
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Sep; 101():1-12. PubMed ID: 37004467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.