These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28550909)

  • 1. Readability, complexity, and suitability of online resources for mastectomy and lumpectomy.
    Tran BNN; Singh M; Singhal D; Rudd R; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2017 May; 212():214-221. PubMed ID: 28550909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability, complexity, and suitability analysis of online lymphedema resources.
    Tran BNN; Singh M; Lee BT; Rudd R; Singhal D
    J Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 213():251-260. PubMed ID: 28601323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of online patient materials for breast reconstruction.
    Vargas CR; Kantak NA; Chuang DJ; Koolen PG; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2015 Nov; 199(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 26088084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online resources for strabismus: an evaluation of readability, complexity, and suitability.
    Davis K; Blades C; Larson S
    Strabismus; 2024 Oct; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 39351891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.
    Tian C; Champlin S; Mackert M; Lazard A; Agrawal D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 24674352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
    Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
    Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.
    Weiss KD; Vargas CR; Ho OA; Chuang DJ; Weiss J; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 206(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 27916381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Related to Breast Lesions Requiring Surgery.
    Miles RC; Baird GL; Choi P; Falomo E; Dibble EH; Garg M
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 30694156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing Readability of Patient Education Materials on Breast Reconstruction by Major US Academic Hospitals as Compared With Nonacademic Sites.
    Powell LE; Andersen ES; Pozez AL
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6):610-614. PubMed ID: 33234883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.
    Eltorai AE; Sharma P; Wang J; Daniels AH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1181-6. PubMed ID: 25475715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability of online patient resources for the operative treatment of breast cancer.
    Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Ganor O; Lee BT
    Surgery; 2014 Aug; 156(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 24953268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the Reading Level of Internet Medical Information for Common Internal Medicine Diagnoses.
    Hutchinson N; Baird GL; Garg M
    Am J Med; 2016 Jun; 129(6):637-9. PubMed ID: 26829438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability of online materials for Dupuytren's contracture.
    Santos PJF; Daar DA; Badeau A; Leis A
    J Hand Ther; 2018; 31(4):472-479. PubMed ID: 28843342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analyzing the Readability of Online Urogynecologic Patient Information.
    Stewart JR; Heit MH; Meriwether KV; Hobson DT; Francis SL
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 29117016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
    Walsh TM; Volsko TA
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability and suitability assessment of patient education materials in rheumatic diseases.
    Rhee RL; Von Feldt JM; Schumacher HR; Merkel PA
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2013 Oct; 65(10):1702-6. PubMed ID: 23687011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of the suitability, readability, and quality of online resources for the self-management of depression.
    Rathod P; Ould Brahim L; Belzile E; Lambert S
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 May; 102(5):952-960. PubMed ID: 30683608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.
    Prabhu AV; Kim C; Crihalmeanu T; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; DeFrances MC; Trejo Bittar HE
    Hum Pathol; 2017 Jul; 65():15-20. PubMed ID: 28504209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration.
    Fortuna J; Riddering A; Shuster L; Lopez-Jeng C
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):391. PubMed ID: 33008367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.