232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28552289)
1. Influence of space size of abutment screw access channel on the amount of extruded excess cement and marginal accuracy of cement-retained single implant restorations.
Al Amri MD; Al-Johany SS; Al-Qarni MN; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Maflehi NS; Abualsaud HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 28552289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the Unfilled Space Size of the Abutment Screw Access Hole on the Extruded Excess Cement and Retention of Single Implant Zirconia Crowns.
Al-Johany SS; Al Amri MD; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Qarni MN
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 28102922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
Wadhwani C; Chung KH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Hess T; Zhang H; Chung KH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vertical Marginal Discrepancy of Retrievable Cement/Screw-retained Design and Cement-retained Implant-supported Single Metal Copings.
Tinedo-López PL; Malpartida-Carrillo V; Ortiz-Culca F; Guerrero ME; Amaya-Pajares SP; Özcan M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):829-834. PubMed ID: 33568600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal Adaptation of Provisional CAD/CAM Restorations Fabricated Using Various Simulated Digital Cement Space Settings.
Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B; Şeker E; Shah K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1064-1069. PubMed ID: 30231093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of precementation on minimizing residual cement around the marginal area of dental implants.
Wang W; Chang J; Wang HM; Gu XH
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):622-629. PubMed ID: 31383528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of a CAD/CAM-guided template for locating abutment screws for cement-retained implant-supported restorations.
Lee DH; Mai HN; Li LJ; Lee KW
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 26868962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retentive strength of implant-supported CAD-CAM lithium disilicate crowns on zirconia custom abutments using 6 different cements.
Sellers K; Powers JM; Kiat-Amnuay S
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 27677215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of convergence angle and cement space on adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings.
Iwai T; Komine F; Kobayashi K; Saito A; Matsumura H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Aug; 66(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 18607834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
Ghodsi S; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Rostami M; Alikhasi M
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of CAD/CAM Abutment Height and Cement Type on the Retention of Zirconia Crowns.
Silva CEP; Soares S; Machado CM; Bergamo ETP; Coelho PG; Witek L; Ramalho IS; Jalkh EBB; Bonfante EA
Implant Dent; 2018 Oct; 27(5):582-587. PubMed ID: 30134265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of the emergence profile on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant reconstructions.
Sancho-Puchades M; Crameri D; Özcan M; Sailer I; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Thoma DS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1515-1522. PubMed ID: 28407306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
