917 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28552622)
1. Minilaparotomy Versus Laparoscopic Myomectomy After Cessation of Power Morcellation: Rate of Wound Complications.
Dubin AK; Wei J; Sullivan S; Udaltsova N; Zaritsky E; Yamamoto MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):946-953. PubMed ID: 28552622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Morcellation Techniques at the Time of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.
Meurs EAIM; Brito LG; Ajao MO; Goggins ER; Vitonis AF; Einarsson JI; Cohen SL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):843-849. PubMed ID: 28483536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-bag manual versus uncontained power morcellation for laparoscopic myomectomy.
Zullo F; Venturella R; Raffone A; Saccone G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 May; 5(5):CD013352. PubMed ID: 32374421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonographic Features of Uterine Scar after Laparoscopic and Laparoscopy-Assisted Minilaparotomy Myomectomy: A Comparative Study.
Asgari Z; Salehi F; Hoseini R; Abedi M; Montazeri A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):148-154. PubMed ID: 31301467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic-Assisted Myomectomy with Bilateral Uterine Artery Occlusion/Ligation.
MacKoul P; Baxi R; Danilyants N; van der Does LQ; Haworth LR; Kazi N
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):856-864. PubMed ID: 30170179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative Outcomes of Myomectomy for Extreme Myoma Burden: Comparison of Surgical Approaches.
Jansen LJ; Clark NV; Dmello M; Gu X; Einarsson JI; Cohen SL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1095-1103. PubMed ID: 30391510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minilaparotomy vs. laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparison of length of hospital stay.
Perron-Burdick M; Calhoun A; Idowu D; Pressman A; Zaritsky E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):619-23. PubMed ID: 24469276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Single-center Retrospective Review of 514 Patients.
Bean EM; Cutner A; Holland T; Vashisht A; Jurkovic D; Saridogan E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):485-493. PubMed ID: 28104498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 30-day Complication Rates between Laparoscopic Myomectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyoma in Women Older Than Age 40.
Sheyn D; Bretschnieder CE; Mahajan ST; El-Nashar S; Billow M; Ninivaggio CS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 30385429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Racial Disparities in Response to a US Food and Drug Administration Safety Communication Regarding the Use of Power Morcellation for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyoma.
Matsushita T; Sekizawa A; Jacobs LK
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):178-185.e1. PubMed ID: 30936031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can In-Bag Manual Morcellation Represent an Alternative to Uncontained Power Morcellation in Laparoscopic Myomectomy? A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Frascà C; Degli Esposti E; Arena A; Tuzzato G; Moro E; Martelli V; Seracchioli R
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(1):52-56. PubMed ID: 28586771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contained Power Morcellation Versus Transvaginal Extraction for Retrieval of Laparoscopically Removed Myomas: A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.
Boza A; Misirlioglu S; Taskiran C; Urman B
Surg Innov; 2019 Feb; 26(1):72-76. PubMed ID: 30047311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Manual morcellation compared to power morcellation during robotic myomectomy.
Sanderson DJ; Sanderson R; Cleason D; Seaman C; Ghomi A
J Robot Surg; 2019 Apr; 13(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 29907929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: practice patterns and health care use in British Columbia.
Chen I; Lisonkova S; Joseph KS; Williams C; Yong P; Allaire C
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Sep; 36(9):817-821. PubMed ID: 25222361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peritoneal Washings After Power Morcellation in Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Pilot Study.
Toubia T; Moulder JK; Schiff LD; Clarke-Pearson D; O'Connor SM; Siedhoff MT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):578-81. PubMed ID: 26867701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Morcellation Warning With Rates of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.
Barron KI; Richard T; Robinson PS; Lamvu G
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 126(6):1174-1180. PubMed ID: 26595561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids.
Bhave Chittawar P; Franik S; Pouwer AW; Farquhar C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):CD004638. PubMed ID: 25331441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of Overnight Admission After Laparoscopic Myomectomy in a High-Volume Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Setting.
Moawad G; Park D; Maasen M; Frost A; Tyan P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):195-199. PubMed ID: 30936030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of morcellation of uterine leiomyosarcomas in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy, a retrospective trial including 4791 women.
Lieng M; Berner E; Busund B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 25460521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic myomectomy and morcellation: A review of techniques, outcomes, and practice guidelines.
Glaser LM; Friedman J; Tsai S; Chaudhari A; Milad M
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Jan; 46():99-112. PubMed ID: 29078975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]