These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28552750)

  • 1. [Does customized weight curves improve prenatal diagnosis of fetuses small for gestational age in a high-risk population?].
    Lerebours A; Callec R; Lauria E; Morel O
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Jun; 45(6):335-339. PubMed ID: 28552750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Customized and non-customized French intrauterine growth curves. I - Methodology].
    Ego A; Prunet C; Lebreton E; Blondel B; Kaminski M; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Feb; 45(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 26422365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Customized and non-customized French intrauterine growth curves. II - Comparison with existing curves and benefits of customization].
    Ego A; Prunet C; Blondel B; Kaminski M; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Feb; 45(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 26431620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Definitions: small for gestational age and intrauterine growth retardation].
    Ego A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Dec; 42(8):872-94. PubMed ID: 24210714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Customized growth charts for twin gestations to optimize identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses at risk of intrauterine fetal death.
    Odibo AO; Cahill AG; Goetzinger KR; Harper LM; Tuuli MG; Macones GA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 41(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 23334992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth.
    Poljak B; Agarwal U; Jackson R; Alfirevic Z; Sharp A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 27486031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Sentilhes L; Ego A; Bernard C; Cambourieu D; Flamant C; Gascoin G; Gaudineau A; Grangé G; Houfflin-Debarge V; Langer B; Malan V; Marcorelles P; Nizard J; Perrotin F; Salomon L; Senat MV; Serry A; Tessier V; Truffert P; Tsatsaris V; Arnaud C; Carbonne B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Customized and non-customized live-born birth-weight curves of single and uncomplicated pregnancies from the Burgundy perinatal network. Part I - methodology.
    Rousseau T; Durand-Maison O; Labruere-Chazal C; Tabard F; Jebrane A; Martz O; Benzenine E; Cottenet J; Sagot P
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 46(7):587-590. PubMed ID: 28529058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Detection of small for gestational age fetuses during third trimester ultrasound. A monocentric observational study].
    Peyronnet V; Kayem G; Mandelbrot L; Sibiude J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 Sep; 44(9):531-6. PubMed ID: 27451063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Impact of the detection of small for gestational age fetuses on the neonatal prognosis].
    Peyronnet V; Sibiude J; Mandelbrot L; Kayem G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Feb; 46(2):71-77. PubMed ID: 29373312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of intrauterine fetal death in small-for-gestational-age fetuses: impact of including ultrasound biometry in customized models.
    Odibo AO; Cahill AG; Odibo L; Roehl K; Macones GA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 21538642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100527. PubMed ID: 34763120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age.
    Blue NR; Beddow ME; Savabi M; Katukuri VR; Chao CR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 30118689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of large-for-gestational age fetuses using antenatal customized fetal growth charts: Can we improve the prediction of abnormal labor course?
    Dall'Asta A; Rizzo G; Kiener A; Volpe N; Di Pasquo E; Roletti E; Mappa I; Makatsariya A; Maruotti GM; Saccone G; Sarno L; Papaccio M; Fichera A; Prefumo F; Ottaviani C; Stampalija T; Frusca T; Ghi T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 May; 248():81-88. PubMed ID: 32199297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of pathologically small fetuses using customized, ultrasound and population-based growth norms.
    Smith NA; Bukowski R; Thomas AM; Cantonwine D; Zera C; Robinson JN
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 44(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 24532059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal and neonatal outcomes of preterm infants born before 32 weeks of gestation according to antenatal vs postnatal assessments of restricted growth.
    Monier I; Ancel PY; Ego A; Jarreau PH; Lebeaux C; Kaminski M; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):516.e1-516.e10. PubMed ID: 28188770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal risk assessment of small-for-gestational-age fetuses using 31-34-week biometry in a low-risk population.
    Stirnemann JJ; Benoist G; Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 24357451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the assumptions of customized intrauterine growth charts using national birth studies.
    Hocquette A; Monier I; Blondel B; Dufourg MN; Heude B; Zeitlin J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Apr; 101(4):405-416. PubMed ID: 35224718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts.
    Hoftiezer L; Hof MHP; Dijs-Elsinga J; Hogeveen M; Hukkelhoven CWPM; van Lingen RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):383.e1-383.e17. PubMed ID: 30576661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.