194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28552922)
1. Influence of size and CCD-angle of a short stem hip arthroplasty on strain patterns of the proximal femur - an experimental study.
Floerkemeier T; Budde S; Hurschler C; Lewinski G; Windhagen H; Gronewold J
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(1):141-149. PubMed ID: 28552922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of resection height on proximal femoral strain patterns after Metha short stem hip arthroplasty: an experimental study on composite femora.
Floerkemeier T; Gronewold J; Berner S; Olender G; Hurschler C; Windhagen H; von Lewinski G
Int Orthop; 2013 Mar; 37(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 23271689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in strain patterns after implantation of a short stem with metaphyseal anchorage compared to a standard stem: an experimental study in synthetic bone.
Gronewold J; Berner S; Olender G; Hurschler C; Windhagen H; von Lewinski G; Floerkemeier T
Orthop Rev (Pavia); 2014 Jan; 6(1):5211. PubMed ID: 24744840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Effects of the Metha® Short Stem on Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling in Total Hip Arthroplasties: Results at 48 Months.
Parchi PD; Ciapini G; Castellini I; Mannucci C; Nucci AM; Piolanti N; Maffei S; Lisanti M
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():346-351. PubMed ID: 28277592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A short stem with metaphyseal anchorage reveals a more physiological strain pattern compared to a standard stem - an experimental study in cadavaric bone.
Floerkemeier T; Weltin J; Budde S; Hurschler C; Windhagen H; VON Lewinski G; Gronewold J
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 31741479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shortening of an anatomical stem, how short is short enough? An in vitro study of load transfer and primary stability.
Østbyhaug PO; Klaksvik J; Romundstad P; Aamodt A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 May; 227(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 23637258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Our experience with the metha short hip stem].
Lacko M; Filip V; Cellár R; Vaško G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 24755060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.
Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of varus/valgus positioning of the Nanos® and Metha® short-stemmed prostheses on stress shielding of metaphyseal bone.
Brinkmann V; Radetzki F; Gutteck N; Delank S; Zeh A
Acta Orthop Belg; 2017 Mar; 83(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 29322896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A plasma-sprayed titanium proximal coating reduces the risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless hip arthroplasty.
Miles B; Walter WL; Kolos E; Waters T; Appleyard R; Gillies RM; Donohoo S; Ruys AJ
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 25(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 26407113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of proximal femoral morphology on failure strength with a mid-head resection short-stem hip arthroplasty.
Olsen M; Al Saied M; Morison Z; Sellan M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Dec; 228(12):1275-80. PubMed ID: 25515228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling.
Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.
Burchard R; Braas S; Soost C; Graw JA; Schmitt J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):343. PubMed ID: 28784121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of femoral strains with cementless proximal-fill femoral implants of varied stem length.
Arno S; Fetto J; Nguyen NQ; Kinariwala N; Takemoto R; Oh C; Walker PS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 22503474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bionic reconstruction of tension trabeculae in short-stem hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis.
Ding Z; Wang J; Wang Y; Zhang X; Huan Y; Zhang D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Feb; 24(1):89. PubMed ID: 36732725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
Widmer KH
Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
