These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2855365)

  • 41. Improved mucosal insert and endodontic implant techniques.
    Misch CE
    N Y J Dent; 1983 Dec; 53(8):393-9. PubMed ID: 6361636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Histological investigation on the osseous retention of apatite ceramics implant].
    Ishida K
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Jun; 51(2):333-71. PubMed ID: 6384389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Transmucosal implants of dense hydroxylapatite.
    de Putter C; de Groot K; Sillevis Smitt PA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Jan; 49(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 6296378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effect of thick mucosa on peri-implant tissues: an experimental study in dogs.
    Jeong SM; Choi BH; Li J; Xuan F
    J Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):2151-5. PubMed ID: 18980524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stress analysis of porous rooted dental implants.
    Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Anand SC; Schuessler R
    J Dent Res; 1976; 55(5):772-7. PubMed ID: 1067291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Histological changes in edentulous oral mucosa under implant-supported overdentures.
    Preti G; Bassi F; Barbero P; Lorenzetti M; Valente G
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Oct; 23(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 8933380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Prosthetic management of unparallel titanium plasma-sprayed screw implants.
    Farish SE; Pansch JL; Sherwood RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 2541242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reaction of surrounding gingiva to permucosal implants of dense hydroxyapatite in dogs.
    Kurashina K; de Lange GL; de Putter C; de Groot K
    Biomaterials; 1984 Jul; 5(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 6091800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Comparative assessment of adaptation processes in abutment tissues after prosthetic treatment with the use of dental implants according to microcirculatory indices].
    Gvetadze RSh; Krechina EK; Kelendzheridze EM; Maslova VV; Khar'kova AA; Roshkovskiĭ EV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2008; 87(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 18454120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Synthetic apatite as an effective implant material].
    Aoki H
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1973 Sep; 40(3):277. PubMed ID: 4520001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bone response to a matched modulus endosseous implant material.
    Wolfe LA; Hobkirk JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 2561742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Load-Bearing Capacity of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Abutments and One-Piece Implants.
    Etxeberria M; Abdulmajeed AA; Escuin T; Vinas M; Lassila LV; Närhi TO
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Jun; 23(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 26373199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of stress induced by implant type, number of splinted teeth, and variations in periodontal support in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a non-linear finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang SH; Chen ST
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 20059424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Advances in subperiosteal implant reconstruction.
    Boyne PJ; James RA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1986 Apr; 30(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 3009243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of artificial aging on the load-bearing capability of straight or angulated zirconia abutments in implant/tooth-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Nothdurft FP; Doppler KE; Erdelt KJ; Knauber AW; Pospiech PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):991-8. PubMed ID: 20862414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The biologic and mechanical effects of stress on oral mucosa.
    Kydd WL; Daly CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Mar; 47(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 7038105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.