These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28554063)

  • 21. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of texting on driving performance in a driving simulator: the influence of driver age.
    Rumschlag G; Palumbo T; Martin A; Head D; George R; Commissaris RL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():145-9. PubMed ID: 25463954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Texting while driving using Google Glass™: Promising but not distraction-free.
    He J; Choi W; McCarley JS; Chaparro BS; Wang C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():218-29. PubMed ID: 26024837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction.
    Guo F; Klauer SG; Fang Y; Hankey JM; Antin JF; Perez MA; Lee SE; Dingus TA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 46(1):258-265. PubMed ID: 28338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
    Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing the demands of destination entry using Google Glass and the Samsung Galaxy S4 during simulated driving.
    Beckers N; Schreiner S; Bertrand P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():25-34. PubMed ID: 27633195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing driver acceptance of technology that reduces mobile phone use while driving: The case of mobile phone applications.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Briant O; Kaye SA; King M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Feb; 135():105348. PubMed ID: 31790969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mild Cognitive Impairment and driving: Does in-vehicle distraction affect driving performance?
    Beratis IN; Pavlou D; Papadimitriou E; Andronas N; Kontaxopoulou D; Fragkiadaki S; Yannis G; Papageorgiou SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jun; 103():148-155. PubMed ID: 28441517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of smartphone interactions on drivers' brain function and vehicle control in an immersive simulated environment.
    Baker JM; Bruno JL; Piccirilli A; Gundran A; Harbott LK; Sirkin DM; Marzelli M; Hosseini SMH; Reiss AL
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1998. PubMed ID: 33479322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of driver distraction in tractor-trailers and motorcoach buses.
    Hammond Olson RL; Soccolich SA; Hanowski RJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():10-16. PubMed ID: 29609806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of mobile phone use on car-following behaviour of young drivers.
    Saifuzzaman M; Haque MM; Zheng Z; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():10-9. PubMed ID: 26009990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. What's the law got to do with it? Legislation regarding in-vehicle technology use and its impact on driver distraction.
    Parnell KJ; Stanton NA; Plant KL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Mar; 100():1-14. PubMed ID: 28081433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An awareness campaign decreases distracted driving among hospital employees at a rural trauma center.
    Rana N; Ross M; LaRock L; Mele J; Cumbo N; Colom L; Trecartin A; Granet J; Behm R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S165-S167. PubMed ID: 30841802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distraction and task engagement: How interesting and boring information impact driving performance and subjective and physiological responses.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF; Garabet A; Simmons L; Maikala R
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():342-348. PubMed ID: 27633231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of Gesture-Based Interaction on Driving Behavior: A Driving Simulator Study Using the Projection-Based Vehicle-in-the-Loop.
    Graichen L; Graichen M; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 64(2):324-342. PubMed ID: 32795200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
    Haque MM; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Classification of Driver Distraction: A Comprehensive Analysis of Feature Generation, Machine Learning, and Input Measures.
    McDonald AD; Ferris TK; Wiener TA
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):1019-1035. PubMed ID: 31237788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Drivers overtaking bicyclists-An examination using naturalistic driving data.
    Feng F; Bao S; Hampshire RC; Delp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():98-109. PubMed ID: 29550613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distracting behaviors among teenagers and young, middle-aged, and older adult drivers when driving without and with warnings from an integrated vehicle safety system.
    Kidd DG; Buonarosa ML
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():177-185. PubMed ID: 28454863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.