These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28554084)

  • 21. Short and long-term visual deprivation leads to adapted use of audiovisual information for face-voice recognition.
    Moro SS; Hoover AEN; Steeves JKE
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():274-281. PubMed ID: 29567099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The good, the bad, and the average: Characterizing the relationship between face and object processing across the face recognition spectrum.
    Hendel RK; Starrfelt R; Gerlach C
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Feb; 124():274-284. PubMed ID: 30529245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An in-depth cognitive examination of individuals with superior face recognition skills.
    Bobak AK; Bennetts RJ; Parris BA; Jansari A; Bate S
    Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():48-62. PubMed ID: 27344238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Category-sensitivity in the N170 range: a question of topography and inversion, not one of amplitude.
    Boehm SG; Dering B; Thierry G
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):2082-9. PubMed ID: 21477606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hometown size affects the processing of naturalistic face variability.
    Balas B; Saville A
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():228-236. PubMed ID: 28025050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Car expertise does not compete with face expertise during ensemble coding.
    Sun J; Gauthier I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Apr; 83(3):1275-1281. PubMed ID: 33164130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using representational similarity analysis to reveal category and process specificity in visual object recognition.
    Jozranjbar B; Kristjánsson Á; Starrfelt R; Gerlach C; Sigurdardottir HM
    Cortex; 2023 Sep; 166():172-187. PubMed ID: 37390594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recognition of face and non-face stimuli in autistic spectrum disorder.
    Arkush L; Smith-Collins AP; Fiorentini C; Skuse DH
    Autism Res; 2013 Dec; 6(6):550-60. PubMed ID: 23894016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Face-selective regions show invariance to linear, but not to non-linear, changes in facial images.
    Baseler HA; Young AW; Jenkins R; Mike Burton A; Andrews TJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):76-84. PubMed ID: 27729230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Domain-specific development of face memory but not face perception.
    Weigelt S; Koldewyn K; Dilks DD; Balas B; McKone E; Kanwisher N
    Dev Sci; 2014 Jan; 17(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 24118764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Configural and analytical processing of familiar and unfamiliar objects.
    Noudoost B; Adibi M; Moeeny A; Esteky H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 16099356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transfer of object category knowledge across visual and haptic modalities: experimental and computational studies.
    Yildirim I; Jacobs RA
    Cognition; 2013 Feb; 126(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 23102553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Novel and familiar object recognition rely on the same ability.
    Sunday MA; Tomarken A; Cho SJ; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Mar; 151(3):676-694. PubMed ID: 34582233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Specific problems in visual cognition of dyslexic readers: Face discrimination deficits predict dyslexia over and above discrimination of scrambled faces and novel objects.
    Sigurdardottir HM; Fridriksdottir LE; Gudjonsdottir S; Kristjánsson Á
    Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():157-168. PubMed ID: 29544151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A new selective developmental deficit: Impaired object recognition with normal face recognition.
    Germine L; Cashdollar N; Düzel E; Duchaine B
    Cortex; 2011 May; 47(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 20547387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Delayed processing of global shape information is associated with weaker top-down effects in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Gerlach C; Starrfelt R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2018 Dec; 35(8):471-478. PubMed ID: 30204050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the Relation between Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia: No Dissociation but a Systematic Association.
    Gerlach C; Klargaard SK; Starrfelt R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165561. PubMed ID: 27792780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual object detection, categorization, and identification tasks are associated with different time courses and sensitivities.
    de la Rosa S; Choudhery RN; Chatziastros A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 21038993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recognition of facial expression and identity in part reflects a common ability, independent of general intelligence and visual short-term memory.
    Connolly HL; Young AW; Lewis GJ
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Sep; 33(6):1119-1128. PubMed ID: 30336725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: Disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception.
    Rossion B; Caharel S
    Vision Res; 2011 Jun; 51(12):1297-311. PubMed ID: 21549144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.