196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28554451)
1. Evaluation of masseter muscles in relation to treatment with removable bite-blocks in dolichofacial growing subjects: A prospective controlled study.
Lione R; Kiliaridis S; Noviello A; Franchi L; Antonarakis GS; Cozza P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1058-1064. PubMed ID: 28554451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Masseter muscle thickness and mechanical advantage in relation to vertical craniofacial morphology in children.
Charalampidou M; Kjellberg H; Georgiakaki I; Kiliaridis S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Feb; 66(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18320415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology.
Raadsheer MC; Kiliaridis S; Van Eijden TM; Van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
Arch Oral Biol; 1996 Apr; 41(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 8771323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical facial patterns: a cross-sectional study in growing children.
Lione R; Franchi L; Noviello A; Bollero P; Fanucci E; Cozza P
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Oct; 35(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 24081727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between masseter muscle thickness and maxillofacial morphology in pre-orthodontic treatment patients.
Soyoye OA; Otuyemi OD; Kolawole KA; Ayoola OO
Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):698-711. PubMed ID: 30348502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Muscle thickness, bite force, and craniofacial dimensions in adolescents with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.
Pereira LJ; Gavião MB; Bonjardim LR; Castelo PM; van der Bilt A
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 17290018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masseter muscle thickness as a predictive variable in treatment outcome of the twin-block appliance and masseteric thickness changes during treatment.
Kiliaridis S; Mills CM; Antonarakis GS
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 Nov; 13(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 21040463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of spring-loaded posterior bite-block appliance on masticatory muscles.
Akkaya S; Haydar S; Bilir E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 10935958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Muscular response to functional treatment of skeletal open-bite and deep-bite cases: an electromyographic study.
Uslu O; Arat ZM; Beyazoya M; Taskiran OO
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e85-93. PubMed ID: 21490994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Masseter muscle thickness in different skeletal morphology: an ultrasonographic study.
Rani S; Ravi MS
Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 20930353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology.
Uchida Y; Motoyoshi M; Shigeeda T; Shinohara A; Igarashi Y; Sakaguchi M; Shimizu N
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):654-9. PubMed ID: 21262936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early management of skeletal open bite with spring-loaded and magnetic bite blocks.
Doshi UH; Bhad-Patil WA
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 20552096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive value of masseter muscle thickness and bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment: a prospective controlled study.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 25582592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment timing for an orthopedic approach to patients with increased vertical dimension.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Schulz SO; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 18174072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term evaluation of rapid maxillary expansion and bite-block therapy in open bite growing subjects:
Mucedero M; Fusaroli D; Franchi L; Pavoni C; Cozza P; Lione R
Angle Orthod; 2018 Sep; 88(5):523-529. PubMed ID: 29683334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment effects of a modified quad-helix in patients with dentoskeletal open bites.
Cozza P; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):734-9. PubMed ID: 16769491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the effects of passive posterior bite-blocks with different construction bites on the craniofacial and dentoalveolar structures.
Iscan HN; Sarisoy L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 9267229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional computed tomographic assessment of mandibular muscles in growing subjects with different vertical facial patterns.
Wong A; Woods MG; Stella D
Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 27468586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative data on facial morphology and muscle thickness using ultrasonography.
Satiroğlu F; Arun T; Işik F
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 16135538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
