544 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28554609)
21. Effect of Vital Tooth Bleaching on Surface Roughness and Streptococcal Biofilm Formation on Direct Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials.
Wongpraparatana I; Matangkasombut O; Thanyasrisung P; Panich M
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):51-59. PubMed ID: 28976842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lack of Buffering by Composites Promotes Shift to More Cariogenic Bacteria.
Nedeljkovic I; De Munck J; Slomka V; Van Meerbeek B; Teughels W; Van Landuyt KL
J Dent Res; 2016 Jul; 95(8):875-81. PubMed ID: 27146702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multi-species biofilm formation on dental materials and an adhesive patch.
Dezelic T; Guggenheim B; Schmidlin PR
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2009; 7(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 19408815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of surface characteristic of different restorative materials containing glass ionomer on
Kelten OS; Hepdeniz OK; Tuncer Y; Kankaya DA; Gurdal O
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Jul; 23(7):957-964. PubMed ID: 32620725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The impact of three strains of oral bacteria on the surface and mechanical properties of a dental resin material.
Gregson KS; Shih H; Gregory RL
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1095-103. PubMed ID: 21894502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites.
Ikeda M; Matin K; Nikaido T; Foxton RM; Tagami J
Dent Mater J; 2007 Nov; 26(6):915-23. PubMed ID: 18203499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biodegradation of Urethane Dimethacrylate-based materials (CAD/CAM resin-ceramic composites) and its effect on the adhesion and proliferation of Streptococcus mutans.
Yu Y; Guo X; Chen J; Zhao Y; Song J; Alshawwa H; Zou X; Zhao H; Zhang Z
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106280. PubMed ID: 38043260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Microbial changes in biofilms on composite resins with different surface roughness: An in vitro study with a multispecies biofilm model.
Park JW; An JS; Lim WH; Lim BS; Ahn SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):493.e1-493.e8. PubMed ID: 31648793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations.
Khvostenko D; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 26621028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of arginine on the growth and biofilm formation of oral bacteria.
Huang X; Zhang K; Deng M; Exterkate RAM; Liu C; Zhou X; Cheng L; Ten Cate JM
Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Oct; 82():256-262. PubMed ID: 28668766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Surface response of fluorine polymer-incorporated resin composites to cariogenic biofilm adherence.
Gyo M; Nikaido T; Okada K; Yamauchi J; Tagami J; Matin K
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 74(5):1428-35. PubMed ID: 18192415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of oral bacteria on the surfaces of resin-based dental restorative materials--an in vitro study.
Willershausen B; Callaway A; Ernst CP; Stender E
Int Dent J; 1999 Aug; 49(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 10858759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Surface properties and Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion of ion-releasing resin-based composite materials.
Daabash R; Alqahtani MQ; Price RB; Alshabib A; Niazy A; Alshaafi MM
J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104549. PubMed ID: 37196686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites.
Kantorski KZ; Scotti R; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO
Gen Dent; 2008; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In-office bleaching gel with 35% hydrogen peroxide enhanced biofilm formation of early colonizing streptococci on human enamel.
Ittatirut S; Matangkasombut O; Thanyasrisung P
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1480-6. PubMed ID: 25132364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gene expression and protein synthesis of esterase from Streptococcus mutans are affected by biodegradation by-product from methacrylate resin composites and adhesives.
Huang B; Sadeghinejad L; Adebayo OIA; Ma D; Xiao Y; Siqueira WL; Cvitkovitch DG; Finer Y
Acta Biomater; 2018 Nov; 81():158-168. PubMed ID: 30268915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bacterial adhesion on direct and indirect dental restorative composite resins: An in vitro study on a natural biofilm.
Derchi G; Vano M; Barone A; Covani U; Diaspro A; Salerno M
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):669-676. PubMed ID: 27881324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of matrix and filler fraction on biofilm formation on the surface of experimental resin-based composites.
Ionescu A; Brambilla E; Wastl DS; Giessibl FJ; Cazzaniga G; Schneider-Feyrer S; Hahnel S
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Jan; 26(1):5372. PubMed ID: 25604698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nano-porous thermally sintered nano silica as novel fillers for dental composites.
Atai M; Pahlavan A; Moin N
Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 22137937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biodegradation of resin-dentin interfaces is dependent on the restorative material, mode of adhesion, esterase or MMP inhibition.
Huang B; Cvitkovitch DG; Santerre JP; Finer Y
Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 29789163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
