These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28555207)

  • 61. Immediate non-occlusal versus delayed loading of mandibular first molars. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Meloni SM; Baldoni E; Duvina M; Pisano M; De Riu G; Tallarico M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(4):409-418. PubMed ID: 30515482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Immediate single implant restorations in mandibular molar extraction sockets: a controlled clinical trial.
    Atieh MA; Alsabeeha NH; Duncan WJ; de Silva RK; Cullinan MP; Schwass D; Payne AG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 May; 24(5):484-96. PubMed ID: 22276690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Immediate transmucosal implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 12-month prospective multicenter cohort study.
    Cafiero C; Annibali S; Gherlone E; Grassi FR; Gualini F; Magliano A; Romeo E; Tonelli P; Lang NP; Salvi GE;
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 18416726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Clinical and radiographic performance of delayed-immediate single-tooth implant placement associated with peri-implant bone defects. A 2-year prospective, controlled, randomized follow-up report.
    Schropp L; Kostopoulos L; Wenzel A; Isidor F
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):480-7. PubMed ID: 15842263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Influence of implant-abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Pieri F; Aldini NN; Marchetti C; Corinaldesi G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):169-78. PubMed ID: 21365053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Aesthetic outcomes of non-functional immediately restored single post-extraction implants with and without connective tissue graft: A multicentre randomized controlled trial.
    Ferrantino L; Camurati A; Gambino P; Marzolo M; Trisciuoglio D; Santoro G; Farina V; Fontana F; Asa'ad F; Simion M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Jun; 32(6):684-694. PubMed ID: 33638216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Four mm-long versus longer implants in augmented bone in atrophic posterior jaws: 4-month post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Zucchelli G; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):393-409. PubMed ID: 27990507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone: a clinical comparative study.
    Crespi R; Capparé P; Gherlone E; Romanos GE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):753-8. PubMed ID: 18807574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Immediately loaded distally cantilevered fixed mandibular prostheses supported by four implants placed in both in fresh extraction and healed sites: 2-year results from a prospective study.
    Krennmair S; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Krennmair G; Piehslinger E
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 24977253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A long-term prospective cohort study on immediately restored single tooth implants inserted in extraction sockets and healed ridges: CBCT analyses, soft tissue alterations, aesthetic ratings, and patient-reported outcomes.
    Raes S; Eghbali A; Chappuis V; Raes F; De Bruyn H; Cosyn J
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):522-530. PubMed ID: 29671940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Immediate, early (3 weeks) and conventional loading (4 months) of single implants: Preliminary data at 1 year after loading from a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial.
    Grandi T; Guazzi P; Samarani R; Tohme H; Khoury S; Sbricoli L; Grandi G; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 26021223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Socket grafting with or without buccal augmentation with anorganic bovine bone at immediate post-extractive implants: 6-month after loading results from a multicenter randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Zuffetti F; Esposito M; Capelli M; Galli F; Testori T; Del Fabbro M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 24179978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Variations in Soft and Hard Tissues following Immediate Implant Placement versus Delayed Implant Placement following Socket Preservation in the Maxillary Esthetic Region: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Santhanakrishnan M; Ramesh N; Kamaleeshwari R; Subramanian V
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():5641185. PubMed ID: 34646885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Immediate versus conventional loading of mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses in edentulous patients: 10-year report of a randomised controlled trial.
    Alfadda SA; Chvartszaid D; Tulbah HI; Finer Y
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(4):431-446. PubMed ID: 31781698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Four-year follow-up of larger-diameter implants placed in fresh extraction sockets using a resorbable membrane or a resorbable alloplastic material.
    Prosper L; Gherlone EF; Redaelli S; Quaranta M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):856-64. PubMed ID: 14696661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Immediate Implant Placement in Intact Fresh Extraction Sockets Using Vestibular Socket Therapy Versus Partial Extraction Therapy in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Elaskary A; Abdelrahman H; Elfahl B; Elsabagh H; El-Kimary G; Ghallab NA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 May, Jun; 38(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 37279214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The success rate of immediate implant placement of mandibular molars: a clinical and radiographic retrospective evaluation between 2 and 8 years.
    Hayacibara RM; Gonçalves CS; Garcez-Filho J; Magro-Filho O; Esper H; Hayacibara MF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):806-11. PubMed ID: 22462471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Immediate provisionalization of dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets: a 5-year prospective evaluation.
    Cooper LF; Reside GJ; Raes F; Garriga JS; Tarrida LG; Wiltfang J; Kern M; De Bruyn H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(3):709-17. PubMed ID: 24818212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A 4-year evaluation of the peri-implant parameters of immediately loaded implants placed in fresh extraction sockets.
    Crespi R; Capparè P; Gherlone E
    J Periodontol; 2010 Nov; 81(11):1629-34. PubMed ID: 20450368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.