BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28556239)

  • 1. Simplified derivation of stopping power ratio in the human body from dual-energy CT data.
    Saito M; Sagara S
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4179-4187. PubMed ID: 28556239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple formulation for deriving effective atomic numbers via electron density calibration from dual-energy CT data in the human body.
    Saito M; Sagara S
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2293-2303. PubMed ID: 28236659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quadratic relation for mass density calibration in human body using dual-energy CT data.
    Saito M
    Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3065-3073. PubMed ID: 33905548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients.
    Landry G; Seco J; Gaudreault M; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6851-66. PubMed ID: 24025623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards subpercentage uncertainty proton stopping-power mapping via dual-energy CT: Direct experimental validation and uncertainty analysis of a statistical iterative image reconstruction method.
    Medrano M; Liu R; Zhao T; Webb T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; Liao R; Ge T; Porras-Chaverri MA; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF
    Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1599-1618. PubMed ID: 35029302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proton dose calculation based on converting dual-energy CT data to stopping power ratio (DEEDZ-SPR): a beam-hardening assessment.
    Tanaka S; Noto Y; Utsunomiya S; Yoshimura T; Matsuura T; Saito M
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235046. PubMed ID: 33336651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A robust empirical parametrization of proton stopping power using dual energy CT.
    Taasti VT; Petersen JB; Muren LP; Thygesen J; Hansen DC
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5547. PubMed ID: 27782721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
    Zhu J; Penfold SN
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental implementation of a joint statistical image reconstruction method for proton stopping power mapping from dual-energy CT data.
    Zhang S; Han D; Williamson JF; Zhao T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; O'Sullivan JA
    Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):273-285. PubMed ID: 30421790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stopping-power ratio estimation for proton radiotherapy using dual-energy computed tomography and prior-image constrained denoising.
    Zimmerman J; Thor D; Poludniowski G
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1481-1495. PubMed ID: 36322128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of proton stopping power ratios using dual-energy CT basis material decomposition.
    Pettersson E; Thilander-Klang A; Bäck A
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):881-897. PubMed ID: 38194501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ex vivo validation of a stoichiometric dual energy CT proton stopping power ratio calibration.
    Xie Y; Ainsley C; Yin L; Zou W; McDonough J; Solberg TD; Lin A; Teo BK
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055016. PubMed ID: 29513647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electron density and effective atomic number estimation in a maximum a posteriori framework for dual-energy computed tomography.
    Simard M; Bär E; Blais D; Bouchard H
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4137-4149. PubMed ID: 32491193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical Note: Relation between dual-energy subtraction of CT images for electron density calibration and virtual monochromatic imaging.
    Saito M
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4088-93. PubMed ID: 26133609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. kV-kV and kV-MV DECT based estimation of proton stopping power ratio - a simulation study.
    Li KW; Fujiwara D; Haga A; Liu H; Geng LS
    Phys Med; 2021 Sep; 89():182-192. PubMed ID: 34390901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian approach to solve proton stopping powers from noisy multi-energy CT data.
    Lalonde A; Bär E; Bouchard H
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5293-5302. PubMed ID: 28752662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of proton stopping power ratio estimation based on dual energy CT using fresh tissue samples.
    Taasti VT; Michalak GJ; Hansen DC; Deisher AJ; Kruse JJ; Krauss B; Muren LP; Petersen JBB; McCollough CH
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 63(1):015012. PubMed ID: 29057753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Theoretical and experimental analysis of photon counting detector CT for proton stopping power prediction.
    Taasti VT; Hansen DC; Michalak GJ; Deisher AJ; Kruse JJ; Muren LP; Petersen JBB; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5186-5196. PubMed ID: 30191573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental verification of ion stopping power prediction from dual energy CT data in tissue surrogates.
    Hünemohr N; Krauss B; Tremmel C; Ackermann B; Jäkel O; Greilich S
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 59(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 24334601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Towards 3D printed multifunctional immobilization for proton therapy: Initial materials characterization.
    Michiels S; D'Hollander A; Lammens N; Kersemans M; Zhang G; Denis JM; Poels K; Sterpin E; Nuyts S; Haustermans K; Depuydt T
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5392. PubMed ID: 27782703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.