These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28556355)
21. Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters. Grantham KL; Kasza J; Heritier S; Carlin JB; Forbes AB BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):112. PubMed ID: 35418034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Statistical efficiency and optimal design for stepped cluster studies under linear mixed effects models. Girling AJ; Hemming K Stat Med; 2016 Jun; 35(13):2149-66. PubMed ID: 26748662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The use of permutation tests for the analysis of parallel and stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials. Wang R; De Gruttola V Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(18):2831-2843. PubMed ID: 28464567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A practical Bayesian stepped wedge design for community-based cluster-randomized clinical trials: The British Columbia Telehealth Trial. Cunanan KM; Carlin BP; Peterson KA Clin Trials; 2016 Dec; 13(6):641-650. PubMed ID: 27430710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Information growth for sequential monitoring of clinical trials with a stepped wedge cluster randomized design and unknown intracluster correlation. Brown SP; Shoben AB Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 32026713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Analysis of cluster randomised stepped wedge trials with repeated cross-sectional samples. Hemming K; Taljaard M; Forbes A Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):101. PubMed ID: 28259174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome. Kristunas CA; Smith KL; Gray LJ Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 28270224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mixed effects approach to the analysis of the stepped wedge cluster randomised trial-Investigating the confounding effect of time through simulation. Nickless A; Voysey M; Geddes J; Yu LM; Fanshawe TR PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208876. PubMed ID: 30543671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Inclusion of unexposed clusters improves the precision of fixed effects analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials. Lee KM; Ma X; Yang GM; Cheung YB Stat Med; 2022 Jul; 41(15):2923-2938. PubMed ID: 35352382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials. Hossain A; DiazOrdaz K; Bartlett JW Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(19):3092-3109. PubMed ID: 28557022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accounting for confounding by time, early intervention adoption, and time-varying effect modification in the design and analysis of stepped-wedge designs: application to a proposed study design to reduce opioid-related mortality. Rennert L; Heo M; Litwin AH; Gruttola V BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):53. PubMed ID: 33726711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level. Moerbeek M; van Schie S BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():79. PubMed ID: 27401771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sample size determinations for stepped-wedge clinical trials from a three-level data hierarchy perspective. Heo M; Kim N; Rinke ML; Wylie-Rosett J Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):480-489. PubMed ID: 26988927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]