These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

917 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28556477)

  • 1. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of an overall standardized mean difference in random-effects meta-analysis if the distribution of random effects departs from normal.
    Rubio-Aparicio M; López-López JA; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Viechtbauer W; Van den Noortgate W
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):489-503. PubMed ID: 29989344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-CART: A tool to identify interactions between moderators in meta-analysis.
    Li X; Dusseldorp E; Meulman JJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):118-136. PubMed ID: 28130936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synthesizing single-case studies: a Monte Carlo examination of a three-level meta-analytic model.
    Owens CM; Ferron JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 22180105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of procedures to test for moderators in mixed-effects meta-regression models.
    Viechtbauer W; López-López JA; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):360-74. PubMed ID: 25110905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression.
    Tipton E
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):375-93. PubMed ID: 24773356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences.
    Pustejovsky JE; Rodgers MA
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 30506832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simulation study to compare robust tests for linear mixed-effects meta-regression.
    Welz T; Pauly M
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):331-342. PubMed ID: 31930705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A generalized-weights solution to sample overlap in meta-analysis.
    Bom PRD; Rachinger H
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):812-832. PubMed ID: 32790019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
    Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk of bias: a simulation study of power to detect study-level moderator effects in meta-analysis.
    Hempel S; Miles JN; Booth MJ; Wang Z; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; 2():107. PubMed ID: 24286208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of multiple endpoint dependency on Q and I(2) in meta-analysis.
    Thompson CG; Becker BJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):235-53. PubMed ID: 26052849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of meta-methods for synthesizing indirect effects.
    van Zundert CHJ; Miočević M
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):849-865. PubMed ID: 32833348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A flexible approach to identify interaction effects between moderators in meta-analysis.
    Li X; Dusseldorp E; Meulman JJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):134-152. PubMed ID: 30511514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Blázquez-Rincón D; Sánchez-Meca J; Botella J; Suero M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36650428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multilevel meta-analysis of single-case experimental designs using robust variance estimation.
    Chen M; Pustejovsky JE
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Jun; 29(3):537-560. PubMed ID: 35786985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.