132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28557615)
1. Trends in Diagnosis of Gleason Score 2 Through 4 Prostate Cancer in the National Cancer Database, 1990-2013.
Gansler T; Fedewa SA; Lin CC; Amin MB; Jemal A; Ward EM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Dec; 141(12):1686-1696. PubMed ID: 28557615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Classic and International Society of Urological Pathology 2005 Modified Gleason grading using needle biopsies from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) trial.
Lucia MS; Bostwick DG; Somerville MC; Fowler IL; Rittmaster RS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Dec; 137(12):1740-6. PubMed ID: 24283854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome of Gleason 3 + 5 = 8 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed on Needle Biopsy: Prognostic Comparison with Gleason 4 + 4 = 8.
Harding-Jackson N; Kryvenko ON; Whittington EE; Eastwood DC; Tjionas GA; Jorda M; Iczkowski KA
J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1076-81. PubMed ID: 27265220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gleason inflation 1998-2011: a registry study of 97,168 men.
Danneman D; Drevin L; Robinson D; Stattin P; Egevad L
BJU Int; 2015 Feb; 115(2):248-55. PubMed ID: 24552193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists.
Berney DM; Algaba F; Camparo P; Compérat E; Griffiths D; Kristiansen G; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Varma M; Egevad L
Histopathology; 2014 Feb; 64(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 24102975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prostate cancer. Part 2: Review of the various tumor grading systems over the years 1966-2015 and future perspectives of the new grading of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)].
Helpap B; Bubendorf L; Kristiansen G
Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 26792002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A web-based tutorial improves practicing pathologists' Gleason grading of images of prostate carcinoma specimens obtained by needle biopsy: validation of a new medical education paradigm.
Kronz JD; Silberman MA; Allsbrook WC; Epstein JI
Cancer; 2000 Oct; 89(8):1818-23. PubMed ID: 11042578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Gianduzzo T; Coughlin G; Duffy D; LeFevre I; Johannsen S; Egevad L; Yaxley J
Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 26325670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recent advances in prostate cancer pathology: Gleason grading and beyond.
Shah RB; Zhou M
Pathol Int; 2016 May; 66(5):260-72. PubMed ID: 26991008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate Cancer Grading: A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System.
Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Oct; 140(10):1140-52. PubMed ID: 26756649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
