782 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28558124)
1. Comparison of glass slides and various digital-slide modalities for cytopathology screening and interpretation.
Hanna MG; Monaco SE; Cuda J; Xing J; Ahmed I; Pantanowitz L
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):701-709. PubMed ID: 28558124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of panoramic digital images using Panoptiq for frozen section diagnosis.
Pradhan D; Monaco SE; Parwani AV; Ahmed I; Duboy J; Pantanowitz L
J Pathol Inform; 2016; 7():26. PubMed ID: 27217976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of microscope-based scanning software (Panoptiq) for the interpretation of cervicovaginal cytology specimens.
Groen R; Abe K; Yoon HS; Li Z; Shen R; Yoshikawa A; Nitanda T; Shimizu Y; Otsuka I; Fukuoka J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Dec; 125(12):918-925. PubMed ID: 28960858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantage of Z-stacking for teleconsultation between the USA and Colombia.
Mosquera-Zamudio A; Hanna MG; Parra-Medina R; Piedrahita AC; Rodriguez-Urrego PA; Pantanowitz L
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Jan; 47(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30457226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital slide imaging in cervicovaginal cytology: a pilot study.
Wright AM; Smith D; Dhurandhar B; Fairley T; Scheiber-Pacht M; Chakraborty S; Gorman BK; Mody D; Coffey DM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 May; 137(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 22970841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. iPathology cockpit diagnostic station: validation according to College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center recommendation at the Hospital Trust and University of Verona.
Brunelli M; Beccari S; Colombari R; Gobbo S; Giobelli L; Pellegrini A; Chilosi M; Lunardi M; Martignoni G; Scarpa A; Eccher A
Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 25565219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening and dotting virtual slides: A new challenge for cytotechnologists.
Khalbuss WE; Cuda J; Cucoranu IC
Cytojournal; 2013; 10():22. PubMed ID: 24379891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic digital cytopathology: Are we ready yet?
House JC; Henderson-Jackson EB; Johnson JO; Lloyd MC; Dhillon J; Ahmad N; Hakam A; Khalbuss WE; Leon ME; Chhieng D; Zhang X; Centeno BA; Bui MM
J Pathol Inform; 2013; 4():28. PubMed ID: 24392242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applications and challenges of digital pathology and whole slide imaging.
Higgins C
Biotech Histochem; 2015 Jul; 90(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 25978139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Whole slide imaging equivalency and efficiency study: experience at a large academic center.
Hanna MG; Reuter VE; Hameed MR; Tan LK; Chiang S; Sigel C; Hollmann T; Giri D; Samboy J; Moradel C; Rosado A; Otilano JR; England C; Corsale L; Stamelos E; Yagi Y; Schüffler PJ; Fuchs T; Klimstra DS; Sirintrapun SJ
Mod Pathol; 2019 Jul; 32(7):916-928. PubMed ID: 30778169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the role of Z-stack to improve the morphologic evaluation of urine cytology whole slide images for high-grade urothelial carcinoma: Results and review of a pilot study.
Kim D; Burkhardt R; Alperstein SA; Gokozan HN; Goyal A; Heymann JJ; Patel A; Siddiqui MT
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Aug; 130(8):630-639. PubMed ID: 35584402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the quality of cytopathology whole slide imaging for education from archived cases.
Sura GH; Doan JV; Thrall MJ
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2022; 11(5):313-319. PubMed ID: 35780060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital Applications in Cytopathology: Problems, Rationalizations, and Alternative Approaches.
Chantziantoniou N; Mukherjee M; Donnelly AD; Pantanowitz L; Austin RM
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 29183021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of using the Omnyx digital pathology system for cytology practice.
Hanna MG; Pantanowitz L
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(4):182-189. PubMed ID: 31272601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An array microscope for ultrarapid virtual slide processing and telepathology. Design, fabrication, and validation study.
Weinstein RS; Descour MR; Liang C; Barker G; Scott KM; Richter L; Krupinski EA; Bhattacharyya AK; Davis JR; Graham AR; Rennels M; Russum WC; Goodall JF; Zhou P; Olszak AG; Williams BH; Wyant JC; Bartels PH
Hum Pathol; 2004 Nov; 35(11):1303-14. PubMed ID: 15668886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating Urine Cytology Slide Digitization Efficiency: A Comparative Study Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based Heuristic Scanning Simulation and Multiple Z-Plane Scanning.
Hang JF; Ou YC; Yang WL; Tsao TY; Yeh CH; Li CB; Hsu EY; Hung PY; Lin MY; Hwang YT; Liu TJ; Tung MC
Acta Cytol; 2024 Apr; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 38648759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of virtual microscopy in clinical cytopathology.
Steinberg DM; Ali SZ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Dec; 25(6):389-96. PubMed ID: 11747236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry.
Gage JC; Joste N; Ronnett BM; Stoler M; Hunt WC; Schiffman M; Wheeler CM
Hum Pathol; 2013 Nov; 44(11):2542-8. PubMed ID: 24075599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytopathology whole slide images and adaptive tutorials for postgraduate pathology trainees: a randomized crossover trial.
Van Es SL; Kumar RK; Pryor WM; Salisbury EL; Velan GM
Hum Pathol; 2015 Sep; 46(9):1297-305. PubMed ID: 26093936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital reporting of whole-slide images is safe and suitable for assessing organ quality in preimplantation renal biopsies.
Eccher A; Neil D; Ciangherotti A; Cima L; Boschiero L; Martignoni G; Ghimenton C; Chilosi M; Giobelli L; Zampicinini L; Casartelli M; Brunelli M
Hum Pathol; 2016 Jan; 47(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 26547252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
