These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2855843)

  • 1. The stress distribution of the hydroxyapatite implant under the vertical load by the two-dimensional finite element method.
    Kitoh M; Matsuhsita Y; Yamaue S; Ikeda H; Suetsugu T
    J Oral Implantol; 1988; 14(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 2855843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A parametric finite element analysis study of the stresses in an endosseous implant.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(7):495-502. PubMed ID: 7881333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of a hydroxyapatite-reinforced polyethylene stress distributor in a dental implant on compressive stress levels in surrounding bone.
    Abu-Hammad OA; Harrison A; Williams D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 10960990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress and strain distribution behavior in the bone due to the effect of cancellous bone, dental implant material and the bone height.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 12122235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The application of infinite element method to endodontic endosseous implant stress analysis.
    Xin H; Ma X; Ying L; Zhang S; Qian Z
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 May; 37(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12419139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative three-dimensional analysis of two finite-element endosseous implant designs.
    Lozada JL; Abbate MF; Pizzarello FA; James RA
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 7643441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis.
    Canay S; Hersek N; Akpinar I; Aşik Z
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Sep; 27(9):591-8. PubMed ID: 9180415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.
    Geng JP; Tan KB; Liu GR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):585-98. PubMed ID: 11404759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of implant geometry on the stress distribution around dental implants.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Jul; 16(4):369-79. PubMed ID: 7107655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.