These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2855843)

  • 21. A comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioglu H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 11951799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
    Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interface mechanics and histology of titanium and hydroxylapatite-coated titanium for dental implant applications.
    Cook SD; Kay JF; Thomas KA; Jarcho M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1987; 2(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 3032787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of load transfer by angulated, standard and inclined implant abutments.
    Tuncelli B; Poyrazoglu E; Köylüoglu AM; Tezcan S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1997 Jun; 5(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 9487817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Thick polished hydroxyapatite ceramic as dental implant material].
    Rudelt HG
    Phillip J; 1989 Oct; 6(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 2561700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of magnetical retaining and bar retaining in overdenture implants].
    Xu S; Cheng X; Hua X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Mar; 32(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 10677962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional finite element analysis of a blade implant.
    Ismail YH; Pahountis LN; Fleming JF
    Int J Oral Implantol; 1987; 4(2):25-31. PubMed ID: 3269833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems.
    Baiamonte T; Abbate MF; Pizzarello F; Lozada J; James R
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 9151632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Thermal-mechanical study of functionally graded dental implants with the finite element method.
    Wang F; Lee HP; Lu C
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jan; 80(1):146-58. PubMed ID: 17001649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.
    Cruz M; Lourenço AF; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; de Castro Lemonge AC; Wassall T
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):421-38. PubMed ID: 17065763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
    Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants.
    Holmes DC; Loftus JT
    J Oral Implantol; 1997; 23(3):104-11. PubMed ID: 9477847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method.
    Lin CL; Chang SH; Chang WJ; Kuo YC
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Oct; 115(5):408-16. PubMed ID: 17850430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible.
    Meijer HJ; Starmans FJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 7916894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths.
    Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.