These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2855843)

  • 41. Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating: a finite element analysis.
    Vaillancourt H; Pilliar RM; McCammond D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 8752556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Design optimization of functionally graded dental implant.
    Hedia HS; Mahmoud NA
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 15156104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Stegaroiu R; Sato T; Kusakari H; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 9509784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Effect of jaw shape on stresses at implant-bone interface: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
    Li X; Han K; Bu K; Liu L; Li G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):428-30. PubMed ID: 12641955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. In vivo horizontal bending moments on implants.
    Richter EJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):232-44. PubMed ID: 9581410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Two-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of bridge design on stress distribution in bone tissues surrounding fixtures of osseointegrated implants in the lower molar region.
    Arataki T; Adachi Y; Kishi M
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1998 Aug; 39(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 9927906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [3D finite element analysis of bone stress around distally osseointegrated implant for artificial limb attachment].
    Zheng L; Luo J; Wang X; Chen J; Gu Z; Zhang X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 24(3):554-7. PubMed ID: 17713260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant--a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Apr; 32(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 15790383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):401-12. PubMed ID: 15248874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of the influence of location of osseointegrated implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures.
    Cunha LD; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Pereira JA
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 18784528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis.
    Satoh T; Maeda Y; Komiyama Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 16161737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Step-wise analysis of the dental implant insertion process using the finite element technique.
    van Staden RC; Guan H; Johnson NW; Loo YC; Meredith N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 18081871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.
    Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A finite element stress analysis of the transmandibular implant system.
    Williams KR; Murphy WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 11843446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of off-axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Hsu ML; Chen FC; Kao HC; Cheng CK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17465356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical and histologic assessment of a durapatite implant after four years.
    Gargiulo AV; Nadimi H; Toto P
    CDS Rev; 1988 Jul; 81(6):30-3. PubMed ID: 2848628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Special surgical considerations in implant dentistry.
    Rosenlicht J
    Implant Soc; 1990; 1(4):2-4. PubMed ID: 1963555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Hydroxyapatite use in dental practice. 3. Use of HA in implantation].
    Jungkunz W
    ZWR; 1989 Aug; 98(8):660-2. PubMed ID: 2561725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.