413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28558484)
1. Confidence of IRB/REC Members in Their Assessments of Human Research Risk: A Study of IRB/REC Decision Making in Action.
Grinnell F; Sadler JZ; McNamara V; Senetar K; Reisch J
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Jul; 12(3):140-149. PubMed ID: 28558484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decisions by Finnish Medical Research Ethics Committees: A Nationwide Study of Process and Outcomes.
Hemminki E; Virtanen JI; Regushevskaya E
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 26333684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.
Pech C; Cob N; Cejka JT
Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 22(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18042949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
Klitzman R
Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: where should we go from here?
De Vries R; DeBruin DA; Goodgame A
Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 16625729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative.
Porter KM; Danis M; Taylor HA; Cho MK; Wilfond BS;
Am J Bioeth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 29313771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time.
Spellecy R; Eve AM; Connors ER; Shaker R; Clark DC
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):432-437. PubMed ID: 29902956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
Ballantyne A; Moore A
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Case-Study of the Resources and Functioning of Two Research Ethics Committees in Western India.
Chenneville T; Menezes L; Kosambiya J; Baxi R
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Dec; 11(5):387-396. PubMed ID: 26994735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uncertainty about effects is a key factor influencing institutional review boards' approval of clinical studies.
Wao H; Mhaskar R; Kumar A; Miladinovic B; Guterbock T; Hozo I; Djulbegovic B
Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 24(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 25108689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members.
Stryjewski TP; Kalish BT; Silverman B; Lehmann LS
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26564945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Barriers to Effective Deliberation in Clinical Research Oversight.
Wenner DM
HEC Forum; 2016 Sep; 28(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 26613717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethics Review for a Multi-Site Project Involving Tribal Nations in the Northern Plains.
Angal J; Petersen JM; Tobacco D; Elliott AJ;
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Apr; 11(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 26928897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IRB Oversight of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: A National Survey of IRB Chairpersons.
Weissman JS; Campbell EG; Cohen IG; Lynch HF; Largent EA; Gupta A; Rozenblum R; Abraham M; Spikes K; Fagan M; Carnie M
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):421-431. PubMed ID: 29902953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research.
Sewankambo NK; Kutyabami P
Infect Dis Poverty; 2022 Sep; 11(1):103. PubMed ID: 36171611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How do IRB members make decisions? A review and research agenda.
Pritchard IA
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2011 Jun; 6(2):31-46. PubMed ID: 21680975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Role of Intuition in Risk/Benefit Decision-Making in Human Subjects Research.
Resnik DB
Account Res; 2017; 24(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 27294429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
