These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28559422)
1. Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus. Chan TC; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 28559422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes. Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Corneal Tomography and a New Combined Tomographic Biomechanical Index in Subclinical Keratoconus. Chan TCY; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V J Refract Surg; 2018 Sep; 34(9):616-621. PubMed ID: 30199566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus. Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection. Ambrósio R; Lopes BT; Faria-Correia F; Salomão MQ; Bühren J; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P J Refract Surg; 2017 Jul; 33(7):434-443. PubMed ID: 28681902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability analysis of successive Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology measurements in different keratoconus stages. Flockerzi E; Häfner L; Xanthopoulou K; Daas L; Munteanu C; Langenbucher A; Seitz B Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 100(1):e83-e90. PubMed ID: 33750037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Corneal Deformation Parameters in Keratoconic and Normal Eyes Using a Non-contact Tonometer With a Dynamic Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Camera. Mercer RN; Waring GO; Roberts CJ; Jhanji V; Wang Y; Filho JS; Hemings RA; Rocha KM J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):625-631. PubMed ID: 28880338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia and Corvis ST parameters for subclinical keratoconus. Song Y; Feng Y; Qu M; Ma Q; Tian H; Li D; He R Int Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 43(5):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 36255612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Scheimpflug-derived corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices for detecting subclinical and mild keratectasia in a South Asian population. Kataria P; Padmanabhan P; Gopalakrishnan A; Padmanaban V; Mahadik S; Ambrósio R J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Mar; 45(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 30527442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Indices in Distinguishing Between Normal, Very Asymmetric, and Bilateral Keratoconic Eyes. Herber R; Hasanli A; Lenk J; Vinciguerra R; Terai N; Pillunat LE; Raiskup F J Refract Surg; 2022 Jun; 38(6):364-372. PubMed ID: 35686712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients. Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):339. PubMed ID: 34544392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Keratoconus Screening With Dynamic Biomechanical In Vivo Scheimpflug Analyses: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Steinberg J; Amirabadi NE; Frings A; Mehlan J; Katz T; Linke SJ J Refract Surg; 2017 Nov; 33(11):773-778. PubMed ID: 29117418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Keratoconus Screening Indices and Their Diagnostic Ability to Distinguish Normal From Ectatic Corneas. Shetty R; Rao H; Khamar P; Sainani K; Vunnava K; Jayadev C; Kaweri L Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 181():140-148. PubMed ID: 28687218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of ocular biomechanics using dynamic ultra high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and normal eyes. Tian L; Ko MW; Wang LK; Zhang JY; Li TJ; Huang YF; Zheng YP J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 30(11):785-91. PubMed ID: 25291757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients. Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical Analysis of Subclinical Keratoconus With Normal Topographic, Topometric, and Tomographic Findings. Koc M; Aydemir E; Tekin K; Inanc M; Kosekahya P; Kiziltoprak H J Refract Surg; 2019 Apr; 35(4):247-252. PubMed ID: 30984982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tomographic and Biomechanical Scheimpflug Imaging for Keratoconus Characterization: A Validation of Current Indices. Steinberg J; Siebert M; Katz T; Frings A; Mehlan J; Druchkiv V; Bühren J; Linke SJ J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):840-847. PubMed ID: 30540367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic Scheimpflug-based assessment of keratoconus and the effects of corneal cross-linking. Bak-Nielsen S; Pedersen IB; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal J J Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 30(6):408-14. PubMed ID: 24972407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced Combined Tomography and Biomechanics Data for Distinguishing Forme Fruste Keratoconus. Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Ramos I; Faria-Correia F; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R J Refract Surg; 2016 Jul; 32(7):479-94. PubMed ID: 27400080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of the morphological and biomechanical properties of normal cornea and keratoconus at different stages. Wu Y; Guo LL; Tian L; Xu ZQ; Li Q; Hu J; Huang YF; Wang LQ Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 41(11):3699-3711. PubMed ID: 34232432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]