These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28559435)

  • 1. Taking distrust of science seriously: To overcome public distrust in science, scientists need to stop pretending that there is a scientific consensus on controversial issues when there is not.
    Kabat GC
    EMBO Rep; 2017 Jul; 18(7):1052-1055. PubMed ID: 28559435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Science denial: a guide for scientists.
    Rosenau J
    Trends Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 20(12):567-9. PubMed ID: 23164600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communicating science in public controversies: Strategic considerations of the German climate scientists.
    Post S
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 24583579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Public Reception of Climate Science: Coherence, Reliability, and Independence.
    Hahn U; Harris AJ; Corner A
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):180-95. PubMed ID: 26705767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reasons scientists avoid thinking about ethics.
    Wolpe PR
    Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(6):1023-5. PubMed ID: 16777590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence and seepage: An evidence-resistant minority can affect public opinion and scientific belief formation.
    Lewandowsky S; Pilditch TD; Madsen JK; Oreskes N; Risbey JS
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():124-139. PubMed ID: 30686473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Information Provision on Public Consensus about Climate Change.
    Deryugina T; Shurchkov O
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0151469. PubMed ID: 27064486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Taking climate change seriously: An analysis of op-ed articles in Spanish press.
    Domínguez M; Lafita Í; Mateu A
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Oct; 26(7):861-871. PubMed ID: 27117486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptions of climate change and trust in information providers in rural Australia.
    Buys L; Aird R; van Megen K; Miller E; Sommerfeld J
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Feb; 23(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 23825246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies.
    Myers TA; Kotcher J; Stenhouse N; Anderson AA; Maibach E; Beall L; Leiserowitz A
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Oct; 26(7):843-860. PubMed ID: 26960910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech acts and performances of scientific citizenship: Examining how scientists talk about therapeutic cloning.
    Marks NJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jul; 23(5):494-510. PubMed ID: 25414919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bioethics and the Framing of Climate Change's Health Risks.
    Valles SA
    Bioethics; 2015 Jun; 29(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 25186465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Enduring Influence of a Dangerous Narrative: How Scientists Can Mitigate the Frankenstein Myth.
    Nagy P; Wylie R; Eschrich J; Finn E
    J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Jun; 15(2):279-292. PubMed ID: 29525895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific Citizenship and good governance: implications for biotechnology.
    Davies KG; Wolf-Phillips J
    Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Feb; 24(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16380180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists.
    Nagy P; Wylie R; Eschrich J; Finn E
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1143-1159. PubMed ID: 28653167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific-Consensus Communication About Contested Science: A Preregistered Meta-Analysis.
    van Stekelenburg A; Schaap G; Veling H; van 't Riet J; Buijzen M
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Dec; 33(12):1989-2008. PubMed ID: 36242521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trust/distrust judgments and perceptions of climate science: A research note on skeptics' rationalizations.
    Sarathchandra D; Haltinner K
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 31691642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The motivations behind science denial.
    McLintic A
    N Z Med J; 2019 Oct; 132(1504):88-94. PubMed ID: 31647799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific truth or debate: On the link between perceived scientific consensus and belief in anthropogenic climate change.
    Bertoldo R; Mays C; Böhm G; Poortinga W; Poumadère M; Tvinnereim E; Arnold A; Steentjes K; Pidgeon N
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Oct; 28(7):778-796. PubMed ID: 31359837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Explaining public understanding of the concepts of climate change, nutrition, poverty and effective medical drugs: An international experimental survey.
    Krauss A; Colombo M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234036. PubMed ID: 32520971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.