BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28560479)

  • 1. The importance of rectal washout for the oncological outcome after Hartmann's procedure for rectal cancer: analysis of population-based data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry.
    Jörgren F; Johansson R; Arnadottir H; Lindmark G
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 May; 21(5):373-381. PubMed ID: 28560479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of rectal washout on recurrence and survival after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Svensson Neufert R; Jörgren F; Buchwald P
    BJS Open; 2022 Nov; 6(6):. PubMed ID: 36458839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of rectal perforation on recurrence during rectal cancer surgery in a national population registry.
    Jörgren F; Lydrup ML; Buchwald P
    Br J Surg; 2020 Dec; 107(13):1818-1825. PubMed ID: 32484249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hartmann's procedure in rectal cancer surgery is often an intraoperative decision: a retrospective multicenter study.
    Mariusdottir E; Jörgren F; Saeed M; Wikström J; Lydrup ML; Buchwald P
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Feb; 409(1):55. PubMed ID: 38321307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rectal washout during abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer has no impact on the oncological outcome.
    Svensson Neufert R; Jörgren F; Buchwald P
    Colorectal Dis; 2022 Mar; 24(3):284-291. PubMed ID: 34726339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low risk of intra-abdominal infections in rectal cancer patients treated with Hartmann's procedure: a report from a national registry.
    Sverrisson I; Nikberg M; Chabok A; Smedh K
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Mar; 33(3):327-332. PubMed ID: 29354849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hartmann's procedure in rectal cancer: a population-based study of postoperative complications.
    Sverrisson I; Nikberg M; Chabok A; Smedh K
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Feb; 30(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 25421100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Local excision in early rectal cancer-outcome worse than expected: a population based study.
    Saraste D; Gunnarsson U; Janson M
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 39(6):634-9. PubMed ID: 23414776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hartmann's procedure vs abdominoperineal resection with intersphincteric dissection in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized multicentre trial (HAPIrect).
    Smedh K; Sverrisson I; Chabok A; Nikberg M;
    BMC Surg; 2016 Jul; 16(1):43. PubMed ID: 27401339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is rectal washout necessary in anterior resection for rectal cancer? A prospective clinical study.
    Terzi C; Unek T; Sağol O; Yilmaz T; Füzün M; Sökmen S; Ergör G; Küpelioğlu A
    World J Surg; 2006 Feb; 30(2):233-41. PubMed ID: 16425079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oncological outcome after incidental perforation in radical rectal cancer surgery.
    Jörgren F; Johansson R; Damber L; Lindmark G
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2010 Jun; 25(6):731-40. PubMed ID: 20349075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a low Hartmann's procedure with low colorectal anastomosis with and without defunctioning ileostomy after radiotherapy for rectal cancer: results from a national registry.
    Jonker FH; Tanis PJ; Coene PP; Gietelink L; van der Harst E;
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Aug; 18(8):785-92. PubMed ID: 26788679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can rectal washout reduce anastomotic recurrence after anterior resection for rectal cancer? A review of the literature.
    Okoshi K; Kono E; Tomizawa Y; Kinoshita K
    Surg Today; 2020 Jul; 50(7):644-649. PubMed ID: 31134371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the presence of intraluminal cancer cells following rectal washout in rectal cancer surgery.
    Dafnis G; Nordstrom M
    Tech Coloproctol; 2013 Aug; 17(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 23719901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Swedish rectal cancer registry.
    Påhlman L; Bohe M; Cedermark B; Dahlberg M; Lindmark G; Sjödahl R; Ojerskog B; Damber L; Johansson R
    Br J Surg; 2007 Oct; 94(10):1285-92. PubMed ID: 17661309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Total excision of the mesorectum in cancer of the lower and middle rectum. Oncological and functional results].
    Kneist W; Heintz A; Wolf HK; Junginger T
    Chirurg; 2003 Feb; 74(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 12599030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
    Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a risk factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis and reduced cancer-specific survival?
    Jörgren F; Johansson R; Damber L; Lindmark G
    Colorectal Dis; 2011 Mar; 13(3):272-83. PubMed ID: 19912285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative adverse events as a risk factor for local recurrence of rectal cancer after resection surgery.
    Waldenstedt S; Bock D; Haglind E; Sjöberg B; Angenete E
    Colorectal Dis; 2022 Apr; 24(4):449-460. PubMed ID: 34967100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rectal Cancer Surgery in Patients Older Than 80 Years: Is Hartmann's Procedure Safe?
    Iguchi K; Mushiake H; Hasegawa S; Inagaki D; Fukushima T; Numata M; Tamagawa H; Yukawa N; Rino Y; Masuda M
    In Vivo; 2020; 34(6):3661-3667. PubMed ID: 33144482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.