BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28560732)

  • 1. Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models.
    Norton EC; Dowd BE
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):859-878. PubMed ID: 28560732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using marginal standardisation to estimate relative risk without dichotomising continuous outcomes.
    Chen Y; Ning Y; Kao SL; Støer NC; Müller-Riemenschneider F; Venkataraman K; Khoo EYH; Tai ES; Tan CS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):165. PubMed ID: 31357938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bridging conditional and marginal inference for spatially referenced binary data.
    Boehm L; Reich BJ; Bandyopadhyay D
    Biometrics; 2013 Jun; 69(2):545-54. PubMed ID: 23724862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Down with odds ratios: risk ratios in cohort studies and randomised clinical trials].
    Knol MJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(28):A4775. PubMed ID: 22805792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creation of Interpretable Summary Measures in Displaying Results from Mixed-effects Logit Models.
    Liu X; Belsher BE; Evatt DP
    J Biom Biostat; 2016 Jun; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 27500009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of conditional and marginal odds-ratios for analysing familial aggregation of binary data.
    FitzGerald PE; Knuiman MW
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 10723105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaction terms in nonlinear models.
    Karaca-Mandic P; Norton EC; Dowd B
    Health Serv Res; 2012 Feb; 47(1 Pt 1):255-74. PubMed ID: 22091735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative Measures of Association for Binary Outcomes: Challenges and Recommendations for the Global Health Researcher.
    Gallis JA; Turner EL
    Ann Glob Health; 2019 Nov; 85(1):137. PubMed ID: 31807416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distance-based logistic model for cross-classified categorical data.
    Vera JF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Nov; 75(3):466-492. PubMed ID: 35080009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of odds ratio or relative risk to measure a treatment effect in clinical trials with multiple correlated binary outcomes: data from the NINDS t-PA stroke trial.
    Lu M; Tilley BC;
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1891-901. PubMed ID: 11427947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal modeling of binary cross-over data.
    Becker MP; Balagtas CC
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):997-1009. PubMed ID: 8117910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing logit & probit coefficients between nested models.
    Williams R; Jorgensen A
    Soc Sci Res; 2023 Jan; 109():102802. PubMed ID: 36470637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Analysis of RIA standard curve by log-logistic and cubic log-logit models (author's transl)].
    Yamada H; Kuroda A; Yatabe T; Inaba T; Chiba K; Iio M
    Radioisotopes; 1981 Jun; 30(6):311-7. PubMed ID: 7323315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On logit confidence intervals for the odds ratio with small samples.
    Agresti A
    Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):597-602. PubMed ID: 11318220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical modeling of the volume-outcome effect for carotid endarterectomy for 10 years of a statewide database.
    Nazarian SM; Yenokyan G; Thompson RE; Griswold ME; Chang DC; Perler BA
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 48(2):343-50; discussion 50. PubMed ID: 18644481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical Issues in Estimation of Adjusted Risk Ratio in Prospective Studies.
    Janani L; Mansournia MA; Nourijeylani K; Mahmoodi M; Mohammad K
    Arch Iran Med; 2015 Oct; 18(10):713-9. PubMed ID: 26443254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding data in clinical research: a simple graphical display for plotting data (up to four independent variables) after binary logistic regression analysis.
    Mesa JL
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 62(2):228-32. PubMed ID: 14962632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjusted intraclass correlation coefficients for binary data: methods and estimates from a cluster-randomized trial in primary care.
    Yelland LN; Salter AB; Ryan P; Laurence CO
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 21335589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpretation of the odds ratio from logistic regression after a transformation of the covariate vector.
    Elswick RK; Schwartz PF; Welsh JA
    Stat Med; 1997 Aug; 16(15):1695-703. PubMed ID: 9265694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One relative risk versus two odds ratios: implications for meta-analyses involving paired and unpaired binary data.
    Zou GY
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 17327243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.