These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. POLLEN TRANSFER BY NATURAL HYBRIDS AND PARENTAL SPECIES IN AN IPOMOPSIS HYBRID ZONE. Campbell DR; Waser NM; Wolf PG Evolution; 1998 Dec; 52(6):1602-1611. PubMed ID: 28565336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linking pollinator visitation rate and pollen receipt. Cayenne Engel E; Irwin RE Am J Bot; 2003 Nov; 90(11):1612-8. PubMed ID: 21653336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Caruso CM Evolution; 2000 Oct; 54(5):1546-57. PubMed ID: 11108583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MECHANISM OF SELECTION FAVORING A WIDE TUBULAR COROLLA IN CAMPANULA PUNCTATA. Kobayashi S; Inoue K; Kato M Evolution; 1999 Jun; 53(3):752-757. PubMed ID: 28565633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preferential nectar robbing of flowers with long corollas: experimental studies of two hummingbird species visiting three plant species. Lara C; Ornelas J Oecologia; 2001 Jul; 128(2):263-273. PubMed ID: 28547475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. INDIRECT SELECTION OF STIGMA POSITION IN IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA VIA A GENETICALLY CORRELATED TRAIT. Campbell DR; Waser NM; Price MV Evolution; 1994 Feb; 48(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 28567780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selection on Polemonium brandegeei (Polemoniaceae) flowers under hummingbird pollination: in opposition, parallel, or independent of selection by hawkmoths? Kulbaba MW; Worley AC Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2194-206. PubMed ID: 23888845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA NECTAR PRODUCTION: OBSERVATION AND EXPERIMENT IN THE FIELD. Mitchell RJ Evolution; 1993 Feb; 47(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 28568101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MEASUREMENTS OF SELECTION IN A HERMAPHRODITIC PLANT: VARIATION IN MALE AND FEMALE POLLINATION SUCCESS. Campbell DR Evolution; 1989 Mar; 43(2):318-334. PubMed ID: 28568547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptive differentiation in floral traits in the presence of high gene flow in scarlet gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata). Milano ER; Kenney AM; Juenger TE Mol Ecol; 2016 Dec; 25(23):5862-5875. PubMed ID: 27392816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consequences of secondary nectar robbing for male components of plant reproduction. Richman SK; Irwin RE; Bosak JT; Bronstein JL Am J Bot; 2018 May; 105(5):943-949. PubMed ID: 29797579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive trade-off in floral morphology mediates specialization for flowers pollinated by bats and hummingbirds. Muchhala N Am Nat; 2007 Apr; 169(4):494-504. PubMed ID: 17427121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. POLLINATION IN FLORAL SCENT MORPHS OF POLEMONIUM VISCOSUM: A MECHANISM FOR DISRUPTIVE SELECTION ON FLOWER SIZE. Galen C; Zimmer KA; Newport ME Evolution; 1987 May; 41(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 28563812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hummingbird foraging position is altered by the touch-sensitive stigma of bush monkeyflower. Fetscher EA; Rupert SM; Kohn JR Oecologia; 2002 Dec; 133(4):551-558. PubMed ID: 28466164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EVOLUTION OF FLORAL TRAITS IN A HERMAPHRODITIC PLANT: FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF HERITABILITIES AND GENETIC CORRELATIONS. Campbell DR Evolution; 1996 Aug; 50(4):1442-1453. PubMed ID: 28565718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Natural selection on floral morphology can be influenced by climate. Campbell DR; Powers JM Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jun; 282(1808):20150178. PubMed ID: 25972465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental floral and inflorescence trait manipulations affect pollinator preference and function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant. Dudash MR; Hassler C; Stevens PM; Fenster CB Am J Bot; 2011 Feb; 98(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 21613116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]