These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28564007)

  • 41. Estimating species trees using approximate Bayesian computation.
    Fan HH; Kubatko LS
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2011 May; 59(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 21397706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Coalescent methods for estimating phylogenetic trees.
    Liu L; Yu L; Kubatko L; Pearl DK; Edwards SV
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Oct; 53(1):320-8. PubMed ID: 19501178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Measuring inconsistency in phylogenetic trees.
    Willson SJ
    J Theor Biol; 1998 Jan; 190(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 9473388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A two-stage pruning algorithm for likelihood computation for a population tree.
    RoyChoudhury A; Felsenstein J; Thompson EA
    Genetics; 2008 Oct; 180(2):1095-105. PubMed ID: 18780754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. New approaches to phylogenetic tree search and their application to large numbers of protein alignments.
    Whelan S
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):727-40. PubMed ID: 17849327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and neighbor-joining methods for estimating protein phylogeny.
    Hasegawa M; Fujiwara M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1993 Mar; 2(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8081543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dental evidence for the peopling of the New World: some methodological considerations.
    Powell JF
    Hum Biol; 1993 Oct; 65(5):799-819. PubMed ID: 7505253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Introduction to the methods of constructing phylogenetic trees with DNA sequences].
    Li T; Lai XL; Zhong Y
    Yi Chuan; 2004 Mar; 26(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 15639989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. SuperFine: fast and accurate supertree estimation.
    Swenson MS; Suri R; Linder CR; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 21934137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On the maximum likelihood method for estimating molecular trees: uniqueness of the likelihood point.
    Fukami K; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1989 May; 28(5):460-4. PubMed ID: 2501507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of Boolean analysis and standard phylogenetic methods using artificially evolved and natural mt-tRNA sequences from great apes.
    Ari E; Ittzés P; Podani J; Thi QC; Jakó E
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Apr; 63(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 22289866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The relative contribution of band number to phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Nov; 24(11):2346-56. PubMed ID: 21848979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis.
    Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 1998 Mar; 47(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 12064232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. MGUPGMA: A Fast UPGMA Algorithm With Multiple Graphics Processing Units Using NCCL.
    Hua GJ; Hung CL; Lin CY; Wu FC; Chan YW; Tang CY
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2017; 13():1176934317734220. PubMed ID: 29051701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Machine learning based imputation techniques for estimating phylogenetic trees from incomplete distance matrices.
    Bhattacharjee A; Bayzid MS
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):497. PubMed ID: 32689946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach.
    Felsenstein J
    J Mol Evol; 1981; 17(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 7288891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Felsenstein Phylogenetic Likelihood.
    Posada D; Crandall KA
    J Mol Evol; 2021 Apr; 89(3):134-145. PubMed ID: 33438113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Renewing Felsenstein's phylogenetic bootstrap in the era of big data.
    Lemoine F; Domelevo Entfellner JB; Wilkinson E; Correia D; Dávila Felipe M; De Oliveira T; Gascuel O
    Nature; 2018 Apr; 556(7702):452-456. PubMed ID: 29670290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Independent Evolution Method Is Not a Viable Phylogenetic Comparative Method.
    Griffin RH; Yapuncich GS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144147. PubMed ID: 26683838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Recovery of mutations of different sizes from a population sample of DNA sequences under variable mutation rates across sites.
    Deng HW; Li JL; Li J
    Mol Biol Evol; 1999 Aug; 16(8):1098-104. PubMed ID: 10507923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.