These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28564567)

  • 21. Chlamydia trachomatis screening in pregnancy in New Zealand: translation of national guidelines into practice.
    Wise MR; Sadler L; Ekeroma A
    J Prim Health Care; 2015 Mar; 7(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 25770718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modelling the impact of opportunistic screening on the sequelae and public healthcare costs of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in Australian women.
    Ward B; Rodger AJ; Jackson TJ
    Public Health; 2006 Jan; 120(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16271271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stable Chlamydia prevalence does not exclude increasing burden of disease.
    Rekart ML; Brunham RC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Mar; 39(3):239; author reply 239-40. PubMed ID: 22337116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study.
    Macleod J; Salisbury C; Low N; McCarthy A; Sterne JA; Holloway A; Patel R; Sanford E; Morcom A; Horner P; Davey Smith G; Skidmore S; Herring A; Caul O; Hobbs FD; Egger M
    BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7497):940. PubMed ID: 15809231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Is screening for Chlamydia Trachomatis infection in all sexually active adolescent females appropriate?].
    Anjot MN; Alvin P
    Arch Pediatr; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1773-4. PubMed ID: 16253489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Screening for Chlamydia].
    Bleker OP; van der Meijden WI
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jul; 149(31):1764; author reply 1764-5. PubMed ID: 16114296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening male prisoners for Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on test positivity among women from their neighborhoods who were tested in family planning clinics.
    Peterman TA; Newman DR; Goldberg M; Anschuetz GL; Salmon M; Satterwhite CL; Berman SM
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Jul; 36(7):425-9. PubMed ID: 19525892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characteristics of gram-stained cervical smear from patients with Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Raddi MS; Vidal AF; Santana DM
    Rev Latinoam Microbiol; 1993; 35(2):159-61. PubMed ID: 8209109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Women.
    Wiesenfeld HC
    N Engl J Med; 2017 Feb; 376(8):765-773. PubMed ID: 28225683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chlamydia trachomatis in primary care: knowledge and practice in Glasgow.
    Kinn S; Macnaughton J; Noone A; Scoular A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Mar; 50(452):214-5. PubMed ID: 10750232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Systematic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis with the molecular biological AMP-CT test in urine samples from young women].
    Orfila J; Mention JE; Sueur JM; Chaigneau C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):555-7. PubMed ID: 12407326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chlamydia screening in primary care.
    Macleod J; Salisbury C; Egger M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Jun; 50(455):502-3. PubMed ID: 10962797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Chlamydia screening: expanding the scope.
    Stamm WE
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Oct; 141(7):570-2. PubMed ID: 15466776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Skolnik NS
    Am Fam Physician; 1995 Mar; 51(4):821-6. PubMed ID: 7887358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Chlamydia trachomatis during pregnancy. To screen or not to screen?
    Carroll JC
    Can Fam Physician; 1993 Jan; 39():97-102. PubMed ID: 8435566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experts reconsider wisdom of limiting Chlamydia screening only to women.
    Voelker R
    JAMA; 2010 Mar; 303(9):823-4. PubMed ID: 20197522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The prevalence of anti-Chlamydia trachomatis and anti-Chlamydia pneumoniae antibodies in Brazzaville].
    Biendo M; Lefebvre JF; Fuentes V; Orfila J
    Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 1994; 87(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 8061533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laboratory aspects of screening men for Chlamydia trachomatis in the new millennium.
    Gaydos CA; Ferrero DV; Papp J
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S45-50. PubMed ID: 18449069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Screening for chlamydia.
    Low N; Harbord RM; Egger M; Sterne JA; Herrmann B
    Lancet; 2005 Apr 30-May 6; 365(9470):1539. PubMed ID: 15866303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among women seeking abortion in Norway. Results from a nationwide study].
    Skjeldestad FE; Jerve F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Jun; 112(16):2082-4. PubMed ID: 1523628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.