These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

707 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28565103)

  • 1. EVOLUTIONARY PREDICTABILITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: DO MATING SYSTEM AND NONADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE INTERACT TO AFFECT HERITABILITIES IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA?
    Tonsor SJ; Goodnight CJ
    Evolution; 1997 Dec; 51(6):1773-1784. PubMed ID: 28565103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonadditive genetic effects in animal behavior.
    Meffert LM; Hicks SK; Regan JL
    Am Nat; 2002 Dec; 160 Suppl 6():S198-213. PubMed ID: 18707477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A test of quantitative genetic theory using Drosophila- effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding on heritabilities and variance components.
    Kristensen TN; Sørensen AC; Sorensen D; Pedersen KS; Sørensen JG; Loeschcke V
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):763-70. PubMed ID: 16033547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CONSTANCY OF POPULATION PARAMETERS FOR LIFE-HISTORY AND FLORAL TRAITS IN RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. II. EFFECTS OF PLANTING DENSITY ON PHENOTYPE AND HERITABILITY ESTIMATES.
    Mazer SJ; Schick CT
    Evolution; 1991 Dec; 45(8):1888-1907. PubMed ID: 28563970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
    Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An exact form of the breeder's equation for the evolution of a quantitative trait under natural selection.
    Heywood JS
    Evolution; 2005 Nov; 59(11):2287-98. PubMed ID: 16396170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic variation and gains in resistance of strawberry to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides.
    Osorio LF; Pattison JA; Peres NA; Whitaker VM
    Phytopathology; 2014 Jan; 104(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 23981282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Additive and nonadditive genetic variance in female fertility of Holsteins.
    Hoeschele I
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 May; 74(5):1743-52. PubMed ID: 1880275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic response and inbreeding with different selection methods and mating designs for nucleus breeding programs of dairy cattle.
    Leitch HW; Smith C; Burnside EB; Quinton M
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jun; 77(6):1702-18. PubMed ID: 8083430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct and indirect genetic and fine-scale location effects on breeding date in song sparrows.
    Germain RR; Wolak ME; Arcese P; Losdat S; Reid JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Nov; 85(6):1613-1624. PubMed ID: 27448623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A LIFE-HISTORY BASED STUDY OF POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE: SEED BANK TO ADULTS IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA.
    Tonsor SJ; Kalisz S; Fisher J; Holtsford TP
    Evolution; 1993 Jun; 47(3):833-843. PubMed ID: 28567912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. THE EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS OF MALE LIFE-HISTORY CHARACTERS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.
    Hughes KA
    Evolution; 1995 Jun; 49(3):521-537. PubMed ID: 28565078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parental effects in Plantago lanceolata L. III. Measuring parental temperature effects in the field.
    Lacey EP; Herr D
    Evolution; 2000 Aug; 54(4):1207-17. PubMed ID: 11005289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of nonadditive effects in yearling weight of tropical beef cattle.
    Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Vitezica ZG; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4028-4034. PubMed ID: 30032181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The quantitative genetics of fluctuating asymmetry: a comparison of two models.
    Roff D; Réale D
    Evolution; 2004 Jan; 58(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 15058718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic predictions under different genetic architectures are impacted by mating designs.
    Ansari S; Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N; Shadparvar AA
    Vet Anim Sci; 2024 Sep; 25():100373. PubMed ID: 39036417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Broad and narrow heritabilities of quantitative traits in a founder population.
    Abney M; McPeek MS; Ober C
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1302-7. PubMed ID: 11309690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How does selfing affect the genetic variance of quantitative traits? An updated meta-analysis on empirical results in angiosperm species.
    Clo J; Gay L; Ronfort J
    Evolution; 2019 Aug; 73(8):1578-1590. PubMed ID: 31206658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Including nonadditive genetic effects in mating programs to maximize dairy farm profitability.
    Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Feb; 100(2):1203-1222. PubMed ID: 27939540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HERITABILITIES OF DOMINANCE-RELATED TRAITS IN MALE BANK VOLES (CLETHRIONOMYS GLAREOLUS).
    Horne TJ; Ylönen H
    Evolution; 1998 Jun; 52(3):894-899. PubMed ID: 28565250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.