BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28565197)

  • 21. Pre and Post-copulatory Selection Favor Similar Genital Phenotypes in the Male Broad Horned Beetle.
    House CM; Sharma MD; Okada K; Hosken DJ
    Integr Comp Biol; 2016 Oct; 56(4):682-93. PubMed ID: 27371390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. No evidence of sperm selection by female common shrews.
    Stockley P
    Proc Biol Sci; 1997 Oct; 264(1387):1497-500. PubMed ID: 9364789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Experimental reduction of intromittent organ length reduces male reproductive success in a bug.
    Dougherty LR; Rahman IA; Burdfield-Steel ER; Greenway EV; Shuker DM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jun; 282(1808):20150724. PubMed ID: 25972470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Male genital lobe morphology affects the chance to copulate in Drosophila pachea.
    Lefèvre BM; Catté D; Courtier-Orgogozo V; Lang M
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):23. PubMed ID: 33573597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. No evidence for a trade-off between sperm length and male premating weaponry.
    Lüpold S; Simmons LW; Tomkins JL; Fitzpatrick JL
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Dec; 28(12):2187-95. PubMed ID: 26332435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No evidence for external genital morphology affecting cryptic female choice and reproductive isolation in Drosophila.
    LeVasseur-Viens H; Polak M; Moehring AJ
    Evolution; 2015 Jul; 69(7):1797-807. PubMed ID: 25962316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila.
    Miller GT; Pitnick S
    Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5596):1230-3. PubMed ID: 12424377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Copulatory mechanism in a sexually cannibalistic spider with genital mutilation (Araneae: Araneidae: Argiope bruennichi).
    Uhl G; Nessler SH; Schneider J
    Zoology (Jena); 2007; 110(5):398-408. PubMed ID: 17869076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exaggerated male genitalia intensify interspecific reproductive interference by damaging heterospecific female genitalia.
    Kyogoku D; Sota T
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jun; 28(6):1283-9. PubMed ID: 25882439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Securing Paternity by Mutilating Female Genitalia in Spiders.
    Mouginot P; Prügel J; Thom U; Steinhoff PO; Kupryjanowicz J; Uhl G
    Curr Biol; 2015 Nov; 25(22):2980-4. PubMed ID: 26549254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Coevolution of female and male genital components to avoid genital size mismatches in sexually dimorphic spiders.
    Lupše N; Cheng RC; Kuntner M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27535025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differential investment in pre- vs. post-copulatory sexual selection reinforces a cross-continental reversal of sexual size dimorphism in Sepsis punctum (Diptera: Sepsidae).
    Puniamoorthy N; Blanckenhorn WU; Schäfer MA
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Nov; 25(11):2253-63. PubMed ID: 22984945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Male and female effects on sperm precedence in the giant sperm species Drosophila bifurca.
    Luck N; Dejonghe B; Fruchard S; Huguenin S; Joly D
    Genetica; 2007 Jul; 130(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 16955327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. One size fits all? Determinants of sperm transfer in a highly dimorphic orb-web spider.
    Assis BA; Foellmer MW
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 29(6):1106-20. PubMed ID: 26881910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rapid diversification of sperm precedence traits and processes among three sibling Drosophila species.
    Manier MK; Belote JM; Berben KS; Lüpold S; Ala-Honkola O; Collins WF; Pitnick S
    Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2348-62. PubMed ID: 23888856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Natural selection and genital variation: a role for the environment, parasites and sperm ageing?
    Reinhardt K
    Genetica; 2010 Jan; 138(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 19333766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microscale laser surgery reveals adaptive function of male intromittent genitalia.
    Polak M; Rashed A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 May; 277(1686):1371-6. PubMed ID: 20053645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Disentangling precopulatory and postcopulatory sexual selection in polyandrous species.
    Pélissié B; Jarne P; Sarda V; David P
    Evolution; 2014 May; 68(5):1320-31. PubMed ID: 24410424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The form of sexual selection on male genitalia cannot be inferred from within-population variance and allometry - a case study in Aquarius remigis.
    Bertin A; Fairbairn DJ
    Evolution; 2007 Apr; 61(4):825-37. PubMed ID: 17439615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination.
    Evans JP; Zane L; Francescato S; Pilastro A
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6921):360-3. PubMed ID: 12540898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.