BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28565360)

  • 1. SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AND SELECTION IN THE WILD IN THE WATERSTRIDER AQUARIUS REMIGIS: LIFETIME FECUNDITY SELECTION ON FEMALE TOTAL LENGTH AND ITS COMPONENTS.
    Preziosi RF; Fairbairn DJ
    Evolution; 1997 Apr; 51(2):467-474. PubMed ID: 28565360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Body size and fecundity in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis: a test of Darwin's fecundity advantage hypothesis.
    Preziosi RF; Fairbairn DJ; Roff DA; Brennan JM
    Oecologia; 1996 Nov; 108(3):424-431. PubMed ID: 28307857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lifetime selection on adult body size and components of body size in a waterstrider: opposing selection and maintenance of sexual size dimorphism.
    Preziosi RF; Fairbairn DJ
    Evolution; 2000 Apr; 54(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 10937232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM IN THE WATER STRIDER, AQUARIUS REMIGIS.
    Fairbairn DJ; Preziosi RF
    Evolution; 1996 Aug; 50(4):1549-1559. PubMed ID: 28565700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of size at metamorphosis on stonefly fecundity, longevity, and reproductive success.
    Taylor BW; Anderson CR; Peckarsky BL
    Oecologia; 1998 May; 114(4):494-502. PubMed ID: 28307898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing two hypotheses for Rensch's rule in the water strider Aquarius remigis.
    Fairbairn DJ
    Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166 Suppl 4():S69-84. PubMed ID: 16224713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fitness consequences of alternative life histories in water striders, Aquarius remigis (Heteroptera: Gerridae).
    Blanckenhorn WU
    Oecologia; 1994 Apr; 97(3):354-365. PubMed ID: 28313630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of fecundity is associated with female body size but not female-biased sexual size dimorphism among frogs.
    Monroe MJ; South SH; Alonzo SH
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1793-803. PubMed ID: 26189727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Geographic variation of life-history traits in the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis: testing Darwin's fecundity-advantage hypothesis.
    Roitberg ES; Eplanova GV; Kotenko TI; Amat F; Carretero MA; Kuranova VN; Bulakhova NA; Zinenko OI; Yakovlev VA
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 28(3):613-29. PubMed ID: 25627276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GENETIC POPULATION STRUCTURE AND LEVELS OF GENE FLOW IN THE STREAM DWELLING WATERSTRIDER, AQUARIUS (=GERRIS) REMIGIS (HEMIPTERA: GERRIDAE).
    Preziosi RF; Fairbairn DJ
    Evolution; 1992 Apr; 46(2):430-444. PubMed ID: 28564034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproductive traits and number of matings in males and females of Cerambyx welensii (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) an emergent pest of oaks.
    Torres-Vila LM; Mendiola-Diaz FJ; Conejo-Rodríguez Y; Sánchez-González Á
    Bull Entomol Res; 2016 Jun; 106(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 26490198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The interplay between natural and sexual selection in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in
    Jiménez-Arcos VH; Sanabria-Urbán S; Cueva Del Castillo R
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Feb; 7(3):905-917. PubMed ID: 28168027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for rapid downward fecundity selection in an ectoparasite (Philornis downsi) with earlier host mortality in Darwin's finches.
    Common LK; O'Connor JA; Dudaniec RY; Peters KJ; Kleindorfer S
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Apr; 33(4):524-533. PubMed ID: 31961983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Change in sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on fecundity.
    Reeve JP; Fairbairn DJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 1999 Dec; 83 ( Pt 6)():697-706. PubMed ID: 10651914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AND REPRODUCTIVE INVESTMENT BY FEMALE SPIDERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS.
    Prenter J; Elwood RW; Montgomery WI
    Evolution; 1999 Dec; 53(6):1987-1994. PubMed ID: 28565440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fecundity selection theory: concepts and evidence.
    Pincheira-Donoso D; Hunt J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Feb; 92(1):341-356. PubMed ID: 26526765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection on body size and sexual size dimorphism differs between host species in a seed-feeding beetle.
    Fox CW; Czesak ME
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1167-74. PubMed ID: 16780517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Size-Dependent Realized Fecundity in Two Lepidopteran Capital Breeders.
    Rhainds M
    Environ Entomol; 2015 Aug; 44(4):1193-200. PubMed ID: 26314065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Field estimates of parentage reveal sexually antagonistic selection on body size in a population of
    Duryea MC; Bergeron P; Clare-Salzler Z; Calsbeek R
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Oct; 6(19):7024-7031. PubMed ID: 28725379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.