BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28565718)

  • 1. EVOLUTION OF FLORAL TRAITS IN A HERMAPHRODITIC PLANT: FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF HERITABILITIES AND GENETIC CORRELATIONS.
    Campbell DR
    Evolution; 1996 Aug; 50(4):1442-1453. PubMed ID: 28565718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. INDIRECT SELECTION OF STIGMA POSITION IN IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA VIA A GENETICALLY CORRELATED TRAIT.
    Campbell DR; Waser NM; Price MV
    Evolution; 1994 Feb; 48(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 28567780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION IN LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS OF A MONOCARPIC PERENNIAL: A DECADE-LONG FIELD EXPERIMENT.
    Campbell DR
    Evolution; 1997 Apr; 51(2):373-382. PubMed ID: 28565351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive differentiation in floral traits in the presence of high gene flow in scarlet gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata).
    Milano ER; Kenney AM; Juenger TE
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Dec; 25(23):5862-5875. PubMed ID: 27392816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MEASUREMENTS OF SELECTION IN A HERMAPHRODITIC PLANT: VARIATION IN MALE AND FEMALE POLLINATION SUCCESS.
    Campbell DR
    Evolution; 1989 Mar; 43(2):318-334. PubMed ID: 28568547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CONSTANCY OF POPULATION PARAMETERS FOR LIFE-HISTORY AND FLORAL TRAITS IN RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. II. EFFECTS OF PLANTING DENSITY ON PHENOTYPE AND HERITABILITY ESTIMATES.
    Mazer SJ; Schick CT
    Evolution; 1991 Dec; 45(8):1888-1907. PubMed ID: 28563970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. COMPONENTS OF PHENOTYPIC SELECTION: POLLEN EXPORT AND FLOWER COROLLA WIDTH IN IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA.
    Campbell DR; Waser NM; Price MV; Lynch EA; Mitchell RJ
    Evolution; 1991 Sep; 45(6):1458-1467. PubMed ID: 28563828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic and spatial variation in vegetative and floral traits across a hybrid zone.
    Campbell DR; Raguso RA; Midzik M; Bischoff M; Broadhead GT
    Am J Bot; 2022 Nov; 109(11):1780-1793. PubMed ID: 36193908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata.
    Caruso CM
    Evolution; 2000 Oct; 54(5):1546-57. PubMed ID: 11108583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heritability and genetic correlation of corolla shape and size in Erysimum mediohispanicum.
    Gómez JM; Abdelaziz M; Muñoz-Pajares J; Perfectti F
    Evolution; 2009 Jul; 63(7):1820-31. PubMed ID: 19245399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pollinator and habitat-mediated selection as potential contributors to ecological speciation in two closely related species.
    Campbell DR; Powers JM; Crowell M
    Evol Lett; 2024 Apr; 8(2):311-321. PubMed ID: 38525033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic Mapping Reveals an Anthocyanin Biosynthesis Pathway Gene Potentially Influencing Evolutionary Divergence between Two Subspecies of Scarlet Gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata).
    Campitelli BE; Kenney AM; Hopkins R; Soule J; Lovell JT; Juenger TE
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Apr; 35(4):807-822. PubMed ID: 29253197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting evolution of floral traits associated with mating system in a natural plant population.
    Kleunen M; Ritland K
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 17(6):1389-99. PubMed ID: 15525423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental floral and inflorescence trait manipulations affect pollinator preference and function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant.
    Dudash MR; Hassler C; Stevens PM; Fenster CB
    Am J Bot; 2011 Feb; 98(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 21613116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid response to artificial selection on flower size in Phlox.
    Lendvai G; Levin DA
    Heredity (Edinb); 2003 Apr; 90(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 12692587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Plasticity and environment-specific covariances: an investigation of floral-vegetative and within flower correlations.
    Brock MT; Weinig C
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2913-24. PubMed ID: 17941839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The consequences of direct versus indirect species interactions to selection on traits: pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata.
    Irwin RE
    Am Nat; 2006 Mar; 167(3):315-28. PubMed ID: 16673341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection on Polemonium brandegeei (Polemoniaceae) flowers under hummingbird pollination: in opposition, parallel, or independent of selection by hawkmoths?
    Kulbaba MW; Worley AC
    Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2194-206. PubMed ID: 23888845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linking pollinator visitation rate and pollen receipt.
    Cayenne Engel E; Irwin RE
    Am J Bot; 2003 Nov; 90(11):1612-8. PubMed ID: 21653336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Responses to selection on male-phase duration in Chamerion angustifolium.
    Routley MB; Husband BC
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1050-9. PubMed ID: 16033578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.