358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28565963)
1. Genomic instability induced in distant progeny of bystander cells depends on the connexins expressed in the irradiated cells.
de Toledo SM; Buonanno M; Harris AL; Azzam EI
Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Oct; 93(10):1182-1194. PubMed ID: 28565963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Connexins and cyclooxygenase-2 crosstalk in the expression of radiation-induced bystander effects.
Zhao Y; de Toledo SM; Hu G; Hei TK; Azzam EI
Br J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 111(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 24867691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic changes in progeny of bystander human fibroblasts after microbeam irradiation with X-rays, protons or carbon ions: the relevance to cancer risk.
Autsavapromporn N; Plante I; Liu C; Konishi T; Usami N; Funayama T; Azzam EI; Murakami T; Suzuki M
Int J Radiat Biol; 2015 Jan; 91(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 25084840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human cell responses to ionizing radiation are differentially affected by the expressed connexins.
Autsavapromporn N; De Toledo SM; Jay-Gerin JP; Harris AL; Azzam EI
J Radiat Res; 2013 Mar; 54(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 23139176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gap junction communication and the propagation of bystander effects induced by microbeam irradiation in human fibroblast cultures: the impact of radiation quality.
Autsavapromporn N; Suzuki M; Funayama T; Usami N; Plante I; Yokota Y; Mutou Y; Ikeda H; Kobayashi K; Kobayashi Y; Uchihori Y; Hei TK; Azzam EI; Murakami T
Radiat Res; 2013 Oct; 180(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 23987132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary and secondary bystander effect and genomic instability in cells exposed to high and low linear energy transfer radiations.
Kanagaraj K; Rajan V; Pandey BN; Thayalan K; Venkatachalam P
Int J Radiat Biol; 2019 Dec; 95(12):1648-1658. PubMed ID: 31486717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased frequency of spontaneous neoplastic transformation in progeny of bystander cells from cultures exposed to densely ionizing radiation.
Buonanno M; de Toledo SM; Azzam EI
PLoS One; 2011; 6(6):e21540. PubMed ID: 21738697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oxidative metabolism, gap junctions and the ionizing radiation-induced bystander effect.
Azzam EI; de Toledo SM; Little JB
Oncogene; 2003 Oct; 22(45):7050-7. PubMed ID: 14557810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of gap junction communication and oxidative stress in the propagation of toxic effects among high-dose α-particle-irradiated human cells.
Autsavapromporn N; de Toledo SM; Little JB; Jay-Gerin JP; Harris AL; Azzam EI
Radiat Res; 2011 Mar; 175(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 21388278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Participation of gap junction communication in potentially lethal damage repair and DNA damage in human fibroblasts exposed to low- or high-LET radiation.
Autsavapromporn N; Suzuki M; Plante I; Liu C; Uchihori Y; Hei TK; Azzam EI; Murakami T
Mutat Res; 2013 Aug; 756(1-2):78-85. PubMed ID: 23867854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cell proximity is a prerequisite for the proliferative response of bystander cells co-cultured with cells irradiated with gamma-rays.
Gerashchenko BI; Howell RW
Cytometry A; 2003 Dec; 56(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 14608634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term consequences of radiation-induced bystander effects depend on radiation quality and dose and correlate with oxidative stress.
Buonanno M; de Toledo SM; Pain D; Azzam EI
Radiat Res; 2011 Apr; 175(4):405-15. PubMed ID: 21319986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Radiation-induced bystander effect: the important part of ionizing radiation response. Potential clinical implications].
Wideł M; Przybyszewski W; Rzeszowska-Wolny J
Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online); 2009 Aug; 63():377-88. PubMed ID: 19724078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lethal and mutagenic bystander effects in human fibroblast cell cultures subjected to low-energy-carbon ions.
Suzuki M; Yasuda N; Kitamura H
Int J Radiat Biol; 2020 Feb; 96(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 31633439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bystander effects as manifestation of intercellular communication of DNA damage and of the cellular oxidative status.
Klammer H; Mladenov E; Li F; Iliakis G
Cancer Lett; 2015 Jan; 356(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 24370566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expression of CONNEXIN43 is highly sensitive to ionizing radiation and other environmental stresses.
Azzam EI; de Toledo SM; Little JB
Cancer Res; 2003 Nov; 63(21):7128-35. PubMed ID: 14612506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation-induced bystander effects in malignant trophoblast cells are independent from gap junctional communication.
Banaz-Yaşar F; Lennartz K; Winterhager E; Gellhaus A
J Cell Biochem; 2008 Jan; 103(1):149-61. PubMed ID: 17516549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of connexin36 in gap junctions between neurons in rodent locus coeruleus.
Rash JE; Olson CO; Davidson KG; Yasumura T; Kamasawa N; Nagy JI
Neuroscience; 2007 Jul; 147(4):938-56. PubMed ID: 17601673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of very low fluences of high-energy protons or iron ions on irradiated and bystander cells.
Yang H; Magpayo N; Rusek A; Chiang IH; Sivertz M; Held KD
Radiat Res; 2011 Dec; 176(6):695-705. PubMed ID: 21988573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Co-Culturing with Fractionated Carbon-Ion-Irradiated Cancer Cells on Bystander Normal Cells and Their Progeny.
Autsavapromporn N; Liu C; Konishi T
Radiat Res; 2017 Sep; 188(3):335-341. PubMed ID: 28686544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]