These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28566848)

  • 1.
    Deshpande AN; Joshi NH; Naik KS
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2017; 8(1):33-37. PubMed ID: 28566848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Seema T; Ahammed H; Parul S; Cheranjeevi J
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(4):332-336. PubMed ID: 33149404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of rotary file system (Kedo-S-Square) in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-in vitro study.
    Mohamed RH; Abdelrahman AM; Sharaf AA
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jan; 22(1):13. PubMed ID: 35042489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'Volumetric analysis of hand and rotary root canal instrumentation and filling in primary teeth using Spiral Computed Tomography' - an invitro study.
    Poornima P; Disha P; Nagaveni NB; Roopa KB; Bharath KP; Neena IE
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 May; 26(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 26146902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Quality of Obturation Using Different Pediatric Rotary File Systems in Primary Teeth.
    Vaishali Naidu D; Sharada Reddy J; Patloth T; Suhasini K; Hema Chandrika I; Shaik H
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(4):542-547. PubMed ID: 34824511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Volumetric Analysis of Various Pediatric Rotary Files in the Preparation of Primary Root Canals Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Chidambaram JVN; Jayaprakash J; Arangannal P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Jan; 17(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 38559863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of Root Filling after Obturation with Gutta-percha and 3 Different Sealers of Minimally Instrumented Root canals of the Maxillary First Molar.
    Zhong X; Shen Y; Ma J; Chen WX; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1030-1035. PubMed ID: 31182216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars.
    Walia T; Ghanbari AH; Mathew S; Ziadlou AH
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Feb; 18(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 27885586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative volumetric analysis of three different obturating materials in primary molars under cone beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study.
    Pandey A; K P; Avinash A; Pathivada L; Kumar B; Kapur D
    Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2023 Feb; 72(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 36197278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of volumetric changes between two pediatric rotary files (Kedo-S plus, Kedo-SG blue) and manual files (hand K-files) during canal preparation of primary mandibular molars: an
    Suresh B; Jeevanandan G; Ravindran V; Vishwanathaiah S; Syed AA; Mokhtari N; Jaafari AHH; Dawood T; Maganur PC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Mar; 48(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 38548633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary techniques for removing filling material during root canal retreatment.
    Zuolo AS; Mello JE; Cunha RS; Zuolo ML; Bueno CE
    Int Endod J; 2013 Oct; 46(10):947-53. PubMed ID: 23506150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root canal cleaning efficacy of rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars.
    Nazari Moghaddam K; Mehran M; Farajian Zadeh H
    Iran Endod J; 2009; 4(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 23940486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of curved root canals prepared using reciprocal rotary files and rotational rotary files.
    Jainaen A; Mahakunakorn N; Arayatrakullikit U; Sutthiprapaporn P; Noisombat R
    J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 29628644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Capacity and Efficiency of Kedo-S Pediatric Rotary Files, Rotary ProTaper, and Hand K Files in Primary Molar Pulpectomy.
    Kalita S; Agarwal N; Jabin Z; Anand A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(3):383-387. PubMed ID: 34720511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time in Primary Molars: Mtwo Rotary Instruments vs. Hand K-Files.
    Ramezanali F; Afkhami F; Soleimani A; Kharrazifard MJ; Rafiee F
    Iran Endod J; 2015; 10(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 26523138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical quality of a matching-taper single-cone filling technique following rotary instrumentation compared with lateral compaction after manual preparation: a retrospective study.
    Krug R; Krastl G; Jahreis M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):643-652. PubMed ID: 27522217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
    Priyadarshini P; Jeevanandan G; Govindaraju L; Subramanian EMG
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2020 Dec; 21(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 32185634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Root Canal Filling in Primary Teeth by Volumetric Analysis:
    Sijeria P; Bhartia R; Swamy Kv N; Kulkarni S; Singla S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2018; 11(5):386-392. PubMed ID: 30787551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Comparative Efficacy of Different Files in The Removal of Different Sealers in Simulated Root Canal Retreatment- An In-vitro Study.
    Kanaparthy A; Kanaparthy R
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 May; 10(5):ZC130-3. PubMed ID: 27437347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of V-Taper 2H, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM in curved canals using cone-beam computed tomography: An
    Shenoi PR; Luniya DA; Badole GP; Makade CS; Kubde R; Khode RT
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(2):181-186. PubMed ID: 28611329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.