699 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28567548)
1. The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies.
Shiri I; Rahmim A; Ghaffarian P; Geramifar P; Abdollahi H; Bitarafan-Rajabi A
Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4498-4509. PubMed ID: 28567548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interchangeability of radiomic features between [18F]-FDG PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/MR.
Vuong D; Tanadini-Lang S; Huellner MW; Veit-Haibach P; Unkelbach J; Andratschke N; Kraft J; Guckenberger M; Bogowicz M
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1677-1685. PubMed ID: 30714158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Image Reconstruction Settings on Texture Features in 18F-FDG PET.
Yan J; Chu-Shern JL; Loi HY; Khor LK; Sinha AK; Quek ST; Tham IW; Townsend D
J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1667-73. PubMed ID: 26229145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Synergistic impact of motion and acquisition/reconstruction parameters on
Hosseini SA; Shiri I; Hajianfar G; Bahadorzadeh B; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H; Ay MR
Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3783-3796. PubMed ID: 35338722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of different reconstruction algorithms and setting parameters on radiomics features of PSMA PET images: A preliminary study.
Fooladi M; Soleymani Y; Rahmim A; Farzanefar S; Aghahosseini F; Seyyedi N; Sh Zadeh P
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 172():111349. PubMed ID: 38310673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiac SPECT radiomic features repeatability and reproducibility: A multi-scanner phantom study.
Edalat-Javid M; Shiri I; Hajianfar G; Abdollahi H; Arabi H; Oveisi N; Javadian M; Shamsaei Zafarghandi M; Malek H; Bitarafan-Rajabi A; Oveisi M; Zaidi H
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2730-2744. PubMed ID: 32333282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data.
Beichel RR; Smith BJ; Bauer C; Ulrich EJ; Ahmadvand P; Budzevich MM; Gillies RJ; Goldgof D; Grkovski M; Hamarneh G; Huang Q; Kinahan PE; Laymon CM; Mountz JM; Muzi JP; Muzi M; Nehmeh S; Oborski MJ; Tan Y; Zhao B; Sunderland JJ; Buatti JM
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):479-496. PubMed ID: 28205306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrinsic dependencies of CT radiomic features on voxel size and number of gray levels.
Shafiq-Ul-Hassan M; Zhang GG; Latifi K; Ullah G; Hunt DC; Balagurunathan Y; Abdalah MA; Schabath MB; Goldgof DG; Mackin D; Court LE; Gillies RJ; Moros EG
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 28112418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of alterations in positron emission tomography imaging parameters on radiomics features.
Ger RB; Meier JG; Pahlka RB; Gay S; Mumme R; Fuller CD; Li H; Howell RM; Layman RR; Stafford RJ; Zhou S; Mawlawi O; Court LE
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221877. PubMed ID: 31487307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can alternative PET reconstruction schemes improve the prognostic value of radiomic features in non-small cell lung cancer?
Tankyevych O; Tixier F; Antonorsi N; Filali Razzouki A; Mondon R; Pinto-Leite T; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Cheze Le Rest C
Methods; 2021 Apr; 188():73-83. PubMed ID: 33197567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robustness of Radiomic Features in [
Lu L; Lv W; Jiang J; Ma J; Feng Q; Rahmim A; Chen W
Mol Imaging Biol; 2016 Dec; 18(6):935-945. PubMed ID: 27324369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of PET and CT radiomics for prediction of local tumor control in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Bogowicz M; Riesterer O; Stark LS; Studer G; Unkelbach J; Guckenberger M; Tanadini-Lang S
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1531-1536. PubMed ID: 28820287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of reproducible radiomic features from on-board volumetric images: A multi-institutional phantom study.
Adachi T; Nakamura M; Iramina H; Matsumoto K; Ishihara Y; Tachibana H; Kurokawa S; Cho S; Tanaka K; Fukumoto K; Nishiyama T; Kito S; Mizowaki T
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5585-5596. PubMed ID: 36932977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of acquisition count statistics reduction and SUV discretization on PET radiomic features in pediatric 18F-FDG-PET/MRI examinations.
Branchini M; Zorz A; Zucchetta P; Bettinelli A; De Monte F; Cecchin D; Paiusco M
Phys Med; 2019 Mar; 59():117-126. PubMed ID: 30928060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiomics based on
Ou X; Zhang J; Wang J; Pang F; Wang Y; Wei X; Ma X
Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):496-506. PubMed ID: 31769230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of respiratory motion on
Chen YH; Kan KY; Liu SH; Lin HH; Lue KH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 24(12):e14200. PubMed ID: 37937706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying the robustness of [
Belli ML; Mori M; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Bettinardi V; Dell'Oca I; Fallanca F; Passoni P; Vanoli EG; Calandrino R; Di Muzio N; Picchio M; Fiorino C
Phys Med; 2018 May; 49():105-111. PubMed ID: 29866335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of image reconstruction methods on quantitative accuracy and variability of FDG-PET volumetric and textural measures in solid tumors.
Ketabi A; Ghafarian P; Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Mahdavi SR; Rahmim A; Ay MR
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):2146-2156. PubMed ID: 30280249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
