BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

898 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28567618)

  • 1. Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Cvenkel B; Sustar M; Perovšek D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28567618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure.
    Wilsey L; Gowrisankaran S; Cull G; Hardin C; Burgoyne CF; Fortune B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):111-128. PubMed ID: 28243926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pattern electroretinogram changes in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma in correlation with visual field and optical coherence tomography changes.
    Elgohary AM; Elbedewy HA; Saad HA; Eid TM
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1362-1369. PubMed ID: 31496271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photopic negative response of full-field electroretinography in patients with different stages of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
    Kirkiewicz M; Lubiński W; Penkala K
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 132(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 26831670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of macular and peripapillary measurements for the detection of glaucoma: an optical coherence tomography study.
    Leung CK; Chan WM; Yung WH; Ng AC; Woo J; Tsang MK; Tse RK
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 15745764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of ganglion cell complex substructures in different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Elbendary AM; Abd El-Latef MH; Elsorogy HI; Enaam KM
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 52(4):355-360. PubMed ID: 28774516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of Pattern Electroretinogram in Ocular Hypertension and Early Glaucoma.
    Turkey E; Elsanabary ZSE; Elshazly LHM; Osman MH
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct; 28(10):871-877. PubMed ID: 31306362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regional variations in correlation between photopic negative response of focal electoretinograms and ganglion cell complex in glaucoma.
    Machida S; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Apr; 40(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 24871085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes.
    Machida S; Gotoh Y; Toba Y; Ohtaki A; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):2201-7. PubMed ID: 18436853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance of multifocal photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.
    Al-Nosairy KO; Thieme H; Hoffmann MB
    Exp Eye Res; 2020 Nov; 200():108242. PubMed ID: 32926894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Banerjee A; Khurana M; Sachidanandam R; Sen P
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 138(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 30635745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photopic negative response versus pattern electroretinogram in early glaucoma.
    Preiser D; Lagrèze WA; Bach M; Poloschek CM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1182-91. PubMed ID: 23307968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring for glaucoma progression with SAP, electroretinography (PERG and PhNR) and OCT.
    Cvenkel B; Sustar M; Perovšek D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 144(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 34652598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. RETeval Portable Electroretinogram Parameters in Different Severity Stages of Glaucoma.
    Kita Y; Holló G; Saito T; Momota Y; Kita R; Tsunoda K; Hirakata A
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Jul; 29(7):572-580. PubMed ID: 32287150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical application of photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open-angle Glaucoma.
    Huang L; Shen X; Fan N; He J
    Eye Sci; 2012 Sep; 27(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 22993054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of diagnostic capability of macular ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fiber layer among primary open angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal population using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and determining their functional correlation in Indian population.
    Barua N; Sitaraman C; Goel S; Chakraborti C; Mukherjee S; Parashar H
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 64(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 27221682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in functional loss associated with ganglion cell complex thinning between patients with glaucoma and postoperative macular hole.
    Machida S; Tamada K; Ohzeki T; Gotoh Y; Kurosaka D
    Curr Eye Res; 2014 Aug; 39(8):845-52. PubMed ID: 24559381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pattern Electroretinograms in Preperimetric and Perimetric Glaucoma.
    Jung KI; Jeon S; Shin DY; Lee J; Park CK
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 215():118-126. PubMed ID: 32087144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Macular and Multifocal PERG and FD-OCT in Preperimetric and Hemifield Loss Glaucoma.
    Kreuz AC; de Moraes CG; Hatanaka M; Oyamada MK; Monteiro MLR
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Feb; 27(2):121-132. PubMed ID: 29329137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between optical coherence tomography, pattern electroretinogram, and visual evoked potentials in open-angle glaucoma patients.
    Parisi V; Manni G; Centofanti M; Gandolfi SA; Olzi D; Bucci MG
    Ophthalmology; 2001 May; 108(5):905-12. PubMed ID: 11320021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.