These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28568273)
1. THE EVOLUTION OF MATE PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SEXUAL ORNAMENTS. Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A Evolution; 1994 Jun; 48(3):853-867. PubMed ID: 28568273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search. Waffender A; Henshaw JM J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evolution of mating preferences for genetic attractiveness and quality in the presence of sensory bias. Henshaw JM; Fromhage L; Jones AG Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(33):e2206262119. PubMed ID: 35939704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection. Pomiankowski A; Iwasa Y Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Apr; 95(9):5106-11. PubMed ID: 9560236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection. Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement. Servedio MR Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The evolution of female preferences for multiple indicators of quality. van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ Am Nat; 2004 Aug; 164(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 15278842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The costs of choice in sexual selection. Pomiankowski A J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The handicap process favors exaggerated, rather than reduced, sexual ornaments. Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A Evolution; 2014 Sep; 68(9):2534-49. PubMed ID: 24837599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A reformulation of Fisher's runaway identifies the heritability of mate choices as a key parameter and highlights limitations of the hypothesis. Fry JD Proc Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 291(2015):20232366. PubMed ID: 38264777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Runaway sexual selection leads to good genes. Chandler CH; Ofria C; Dworkin I Evolution; 2013 Jan; 67(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 23289565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters. Heisler IL Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SEXUAL SELECTION BY THE HANDICAP MECHANISM. Heywood JS Evolution; 1989 Nov; 43(7):1387-1397. PubMed ID: 28564247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple Sexual Ornaments Coevolve with Multiple Mating Preferences. Brooks R; Couldridge V Am Nat; 1999 Jul; 154(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 29587499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of a mating preference for a dual-utility trait used in intrasexual competition in genetically monogamous populations. Stern CA; Servedio MR Ecol Evol; 2017 Oct; 7(19):8008-8016. PubMed ID: 29043052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects. Day T Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):715-30. PubMed ID: 10937247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Chaine AS; Lyon BE Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):459-62. PubMed ID: 18218896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GOOD GENES AND DIRECT SELECTION IN THE EVOLUTION OF MATING PREFERENCES. Kirkpatrick M Evolution; 1996 Dec; 50(6):2125-2140. PubMed ID: 28565675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]